Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the restrict-user-access domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: Class Jetpack_Geo_Location is deprecated since version 14.3 with no alternative available. in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($limit) of type int is deprecated in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/add-meta-tags/metadata/amt_basic.php on line 118
Draw-down | Portfolio Yoga

To Hedge or Not


When markets crack and they do crack all the time, it doesn’t really matter whether your portfolio is made of high quality stocks or low quality, your portfolio will take a hit. The only difference would be in percentage with high quality portfolio’s tumbling way less than low quality portfolios.

Derivatives were introduced to enable long term investors to take a hedge against short term corrections using options. But using options as a tool to protect portfolio from falls such as one we saw on Friday doesn’t come cheap.

Nifty 50 closed at 9965 on Friday. If one wanted to take a hedge, the best way would be to buy a At-The-Money (ATM) Put Option. A Put option, for those who don’t trade Derivatives, makes money when market falls. With October Futures traeding well above the 10K mark, the ATM option to buy would be the 10,000 Put.

Nifty 50 contract size is 75 and with the strike price at 10,000, this means a exposure of 7.5 Lakhs. In other words, if you have a portfolio that is totally correlated to Nifty 50, buying one contract of Nifty 50 should be enough for every 7.5 Lakhs of Portfolio Value.

But portfolios are rarely correlated to Nifty 50. While last week saw Indices dipping by 1.2%, the Median fall witnessed among Large Cap Funds (Direct) was 1.47% with the worst performer being Taurus Starshare Fund which fell 2.72%.

Nifty Midcap 100 Freefloat Index and Nifty Small Cap 100 Freefloat Index fell by 2.9% each. I would assume most investor portfolio’s fell by as much or more. This suggests that buying 1 Lot of Nifty 50 Put may not be actually enough to protect the downside.

The Nifty 50 10,000 Put of October closed at 135. One unit hence shall cost Rs.10,125. In other words, the cost of Insurance for a month will cost 1.35%. Not bad but then again, one needs to remember that most portfolio’s require more than 1 lot for every 7.5 lakhs of portfolio. At 2 lots, the cost now doubles to 2.70% – an amount that will disappear if Nifty closes anywhere above 10,000 on October 26, 2017

A better way to Hedge?

The risk of hedging using options is that by the time the market falls eventually, you may have run out of patience to keep buying puts and seeing them expire worthless.

A simpler and better way is to reduce exposure by way of Asset Allocation. While we all want to maximize when markets are going up, its tough to bear the pain when markets turn the other. This also means that when markets drop, you have cash to deploy rather than be part of the herd that pained by the enormity of the fall is waiting to just off load at any price.

Markets have changed dramatically since 2008. Any one looking into the past and hoping to invest when markets fall like they did in 2008 has been waiting for a very long time even as markets have gone one way up.

The chart above depicts draw-down from 52 wee highs that were seen in Nifty from 1995 to 2008. While we have more deeper corrections pre-2000 than post-2000, we did see some regular deep cuts. From 2003 – 2008, Indices rose 500% though we did have two cuts of 30% or more.

The same chart but now showing the 2009 – 2017 time frame. Not a single reaction of 30%, forget more. Comparing and Contrasting the two charts suggests that what earlier was 30% is now 20%, what was then 20%, now more of 10% and what was 10% now more of 5%.

Of course, this is no suggestion that we may not see a 50% or higher fall in the coming years – there is nothing like never again. But while probability of a fall of 50% or more is low, that is not the case when market tanks 10% or 20% from the peak.

We saw a 10% fall towards the end of 2016, a year which began with markets continuing to drop and finally bottom out 25% below the peak of 2015.

You asset allocation should take into account, the kind of loss you are willing to suffer if market crack 10% and yet have allocation that you can add more at that point as at the point when markets down 20% and later at 30%. I am using round figures though you are free to use any number you feel is place where you should start investing more.

The final objective needs to be that you are at the maximum exposure you are comfortable at the worst possible time. The negative of this strategy is that you will never be at the maximum for most of the times and that is okay if you understand the thought process is more about enabling you to stay through the journey.

To get a better understanding, here is a table that lists the draw-down in Nifty (from 52 Week Highs) using the Percentile method

What the above two data charts point out is the probability of market draw-downs > 40% from Year high of 52 Highs is pretty slim. Yes, we have had instances of market falling 50% or more, but as the above data shows, the amount of time markets spend there is less than 1%. This Analysis was conducted using data from 1990 to 2017. In 27 years, markets spent less than 14 week below such levels.

Waiting for the proverbial shoe to fall generally means that investors add more risk to their portfolio’s when they should actually be reducing and when that results in disappointment, reduce risk when one needs to add.

Reducing draw-down comes with a reduction in returns but what use are returns of the future if we cannot live through a draw-down? Food for thought?

Getting the right perspective #Nifty

As long as the going is good, one has not a care of the factors that are driving or the factors that are being ignored. But as soon as the markets start to react, all the worst kept fears start coming up as the reasons markets may continue to fall and even though markets are already down quite a bit, commentators make it seems that this is just the start of a massive fall that can continue for long.

Since 2008, every fall (and we have seen a nice intra-year correction every year, but more of it later) is seen as the start of the fall which will be similar if not even more severe than 2008.

In 2013, markets made the low of the year on 28-08-13. On that day, we closed 14.58% below the highest close of the year. The key reason ascribed for the fall was “US military action on Syria”. Of course, while Syria continues to burn, markets themselves made a splendid recovery.

Its interesting how media can blow up news to make it seem that the End of Day is nearby. This India Today (Link) report seemed to suggest that the end for India was near – Doomsday being the word used. Do check the date of the report – its a day before markets bottomed out. Markets closed the year flat (gaining around 20% from the day of the low).

23rd of May 2012 was when markets made the low of that year. On that day, Economic Times carried a article which quoted the following

“It seems all grim,” Morgan Stanley’s Ridham Desai said in a note. “The macro mix exposes India to global events more than it may choose to.” Morgan forecasts current account deficit — the excess of imports over exports — and fiscal deficit to fall this year, which will help equities.

Another reason for the crash was Greece. Remember the PIIGS? While once again, we are yet to see there being any recuperation by those countries from the hole they dug themselves into, markets recovered pretty strongly. In fact, one of the reasons that is being ascribed to the current fall comes back to the issue of Greece.

December turned to be a pretty bad month for Indian markets in 2011 as it capitulated towards the close of the hear. Instead of having a Santa Claus rally, we saw the fear of Halloween. The whole year as such was one of bearishness but the final cut came as RBI did not cut CRR as markets expected in face of a weak IPP indicated a economic slowdown. Analysts were worried about the worsening asset quality of banks, especially those in the public sector.

While markets did not recover in 2011, we saw one of the best rallies with the start of 2012 with January and February posting a very strong up-move.

The average draw-down we see every year comes to around 13% and this year, we had not seen a deep draw-down till date. Even after today’s fall, we have fallen just 5.43% from the peak of the year.

DD

As the above chart clearly lays out, from the top for the year, Nifty has in no year retraced less than 10.66%. Some food for thought, eh 🙂

I strongly believe that the current situation is not anywhere close to what we witnessed in 2007 / 2008. By almost all parameters, we are much better, much cheaper and better equipped to handle any fall out that may arise out of international events. But with markets becoming volatile, its easy to lose perspective and go with the herd. The herd unfortunately as evidence has pointed out many a time in the past tends to act wrong at the worst possible time.

In my earlier view on Nifty, I had said that this time maybe different. While markets had immediately bounced back, the reasoning I had was not unfounded and I believe that even now, some more pain maybe on the cards. But instead of rushing to the exit, that maybe the best time to load onto stocks that you had missed when it had rallied earlier.

The case for Draw-downs

The biggest worry for a Systematic Trader is the Draw-down number. Bigger the number, more he worries about his ability to trade the system since it can be  psychologically difficult to maintain composure when a large part of the capital has been temporarily lost. I say temporarily because unless you throw the bath water with the baby, a good system will always see the previous high being re-claimed in due course of time.

Lets face it, you shall face a draw-down no matter which class of asset you put your money in (exception being Fixed Deposit). Equity Mutual Funds / Debt Mutual Funds even Real Estate face a draw-down at one or the other point if one takes in a sufficiently large time frame. 

Many mutual funds for example had a draw-down of more than 30 – 40% when the financial crisis hit the market and this is un-leveraged. Many stocks on the other side hemorrhaged as they lost greater than 50% as the crisis dragged on. So, deep draw-downs are not uncommon no matter what class of investment you choose to make.

The reason for the thought to write about draw-downs came to my mind basically due the exchange of tweets regarding draw-down in Titan during the 2008 financial crisis between Professor Sanjay Bakshi & Debasish Basu (Link). The stock under discussion was Titan which between its high in 2007 and low in 2009 fell by around 62.75%. If a 62% draw-down lasting more than 15 months will not psyche out someone, I doubt anything else can.

Its amazing that while we face draw-downs everywhere, including in life. its only in financial markets that we become paranoid and unable to grasp the longer term picture. Of course, even in life, weak minded people facing a stiff draw-down think of ending the life to end the pain, but for the vast majority, we some how are able to make up for everything and get back to our feet.

Being a very strong believer in systematic based trading, I regularly test ideas that either I develop myself or read about it somewhere else. The one thing that is common in most winning strategies is the huge draw-down. You cannot aim and possibly get 40% return without being ready to risk a draw-down of 60% – 80%. While its easy to talk about Risk to Reward ratio being at least 1:2 if not more, when it comes to draw-down, its always inverse.

One of the questions I am regularly asked is, How can I reduce the draw-down without it affecting the returns in a major way. Unfortunately, markets is all about give and take, you want to reduce draw-downs, you will face reduced returns as well. Just in case if you are wondering as to whether there exists strategies that have a very low draw-down while still having fairly good results, there are.

One is a heavily data-mined strategy which ensures that your historical draw-down is pretty low while compared to the historical returns. Of course, once you start trading that in real time you suddenly see that while the returns remain the same (at best), the draw-down goes completely off scale and unless one has prepared for it, chances of the system bankrupting the user is pretty high.

Second way is if you can game the system. While there is quite a bit of debate on whether HFT’s are gaming the system, I doubt you can have a record like that of Virtu Financial which had just one day of loss (and that too due to human error) while accounting for 1237 days of profit. While Arbitrage is said to be having low risk, this is something of a Zero Risk which is theoretically impossible (free money anyone?) unless they found a way to game the system.

Coming back, I believe that traders are more scared of draw-downs than Investors for two reasons. One, the trader is using leverage which easily balloons up the losses in a short span of time. Investors on the other hand generally have invested in full and would need to pay no more regardless of where the price goes. Getting a call from your broker to arrange for Marked to Market loss every other day can take a toll.

Secondly, a investor can avoid looking at the market for extended period of time during which the price may have come down and then bobbed up while a trader would be stuck to looking at every tick and hence pass through the emotions much quickly. If you are having a position which is under-water and loosing money every day and you hear the talking heads on TV giving out targets which would normally be preposterous, its tough indeed to sit quietly and wait till the things calm down.

Of course, does that doesn’t mean that a Investor is a winner in most situations while a trader is not since we have not accounted for a lot of cognitive biases that affect the way we look at things in life. I for one believe that a trader can compound money much faster than any investor (remember, Leverage is a double edge sword) but that is only if he is able to look at things not in the way its presented but in the way, its impact on the future is. 

To Conclude, a Big Draw-down is not necessarily bad and in the same way a small draw-down may not be necessarily good. Its all relative to something else (all the time) 🙂