Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the restrict-user-access domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: Class Jetpack_Geo_Location is deprecated since version 14.3 with no alternative available. in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($limit) of type int is deprecated in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/add-meta-tags/metadata/amt_basic.php on line 118
Asset Allocation | Portfolio Yoga

Misplaced Anger

With Equity Markets taking a beating, Questions are being raised about the efficiency of pure Equity funds with even AMC heads these days promoting Balanced / Dynamic / Asset Management funds as the better alternative for they haven’t fallen as much as Equity.

Of course, given the fact that most of these fund houses run larger pure equity funds, the current fascination with these funds will last only as long as equity seems volatile. The moment the pure equity funds start generating stronger returns, the focus will once again shift back to those funds.

Most of these funds run based on a simple quantitative model of allocation to equities being dependent on the price earnings ratio of the Index. As markets become expensive, the equity weights in these funds go lower and vice versa. The Portfolio Yoga Asset Allocator too works on a similar frame-work.

If you are comfortable with market returns without the accompanying market risks, these can be good funds to invest given that the Large Cap Equity Premium in India for quite a while has been negligible.

Look at the comparative chart (Source: Valueresearch) comparing Large Cap Index Fund, Mid Cap & Small Cap active funds versus a simple Liquid Fund and ICICI Pru Balanced Advantage which is a Asset Allocation Hybrid Fund.

The best fund from the starting point of this chart – DSP Small Cap Fund {SBI Small Cap fund had similar returns for the said period}.

But this performance did not come with low volatility. In fact, DSP head Kalpen Parekh recently tweeted this

The trade-off to attempt a higher return is by taking a higher risk. Mid Caps are riskier than Large Caps and Small Caps are riskier than Mid Caps. While Mid and Small Cap stocks have more or less been bearish since 2018, the returns are even today substantially better than large caps.

While I don’t know if the trend will continue in the future as well, we can only base our decisions based on past data. But what I am trying to showcase is that there is no free lunch wherein you can have the upside of equity with the downside or volatility of Bonds.

Buy and Hold on Equity has not generated phenomenal returns for investors. But that has been seen in history as well – the returns are lumpy in nature. If there is no Risk Management, you gain in the good days and lose some of that in the bad days and overall hope you can beat a simple fixed income return on the long term.

While some amount of Risk Management by cutting off the fat tails to the left can be achieved by using a trend following filter, there are trade offs to be made and one which may not yield greatly in terms of return but provide you comfort when it comes to Risk. 

The Importance of Asset Allocation in one’s investment framework

Managing money is tough regardless of whether it’s one’s own money or the money of others, there is a responsibility of wisely managing it. Most of us wish to outsource this clumsy business to others – mutual funds, banks, etc. In some ways we always feel they with their superior skills will be able to manage our assets better than we ever can.

The question that confronts many is our ability to gauge whether the investment we have done is on the right track. One way experts advise is to forget about returns and concentrate upon whether we are on track to meet the goals. This is actually pretty good advise given that the final objective of our investments is to meet our goals, be it ensuring that we have enough to tide over the years when we will no longer be employed or goals such as ensuring that we can celebrate the wedding of our children or enable them to make choices when it comes to education without worrying where the money is going to come from.

But the problem with the current way of goal planning anticipates a steady return from markets and continuous employment and ability to contribute on a continuous basis. For most, this is the simple way given that we really cannot forecast the uncertainties that may arise in the midst of our journey but one where the long term averages provide us both hope and a sense of being in the right direction.

The current market fall would have created a massive divergence between where you planned to be versus where you had to be. But if you have a long road ahead, the probability is that this glitch will overtime be overcome and then some.

For most, asset allocation ratio is something you plan once and then forget about it. While the equity part is seen as the driver for growth, the debt part is seen as the stabilizer. How much equity you have is based on your risk profile and how long your target time is. Longer the time and higher the risk taking ability, greater the allocation to equities that is recommended.

This fall brings about many lessons. Key among these is that imported templates of debt equity split we bring from the United States is not really applicable to developing countries such as India where Interest Rates are pretty high relatively speaking. India is one of the very few countries to have real positive interest rates while much of the world has negative.   

Last year was a lesson in better understanding Debt funds and the risk they come with. This time, its Equity even though the risk was supposedly known. 

One common observation among all historic falls has been the panicking of the retail investor. We are nowhere close to that this time around with more funds being added. I don’t think human behavior with respect to Fear and Greed can be changed by uttering the mantra “Mutual Fund Sahi Hai”  1001 times.

To me, this means that the bear market which more or less started for the broader markets 2 and quarter years back and one that started for the mainline indices a month back is nowhere close to where it could bottom.

Time in markets is more important than Timing the markets they say. While this is true based once again using historical data, living through such times is tougher than most anticipated when looking at a long term chart of an Index. To me, this is India’s first real bear market in a long time since it is impacting the common folk as much as the Investor. Key lessons to learn out there for sure.

This time its’ No’ Different

Markets Falls are common though we had the uncommon pleasure of not falling big for nearly a decade. What differentiates this fall from others is the fear that the world may never be the same again.

Almost all falls of the past are those that were caused by financial stress or bubbles caused by easy money policies or scams. This is the first real crisis caused worldwide by something that couldn’t have been foreseen.

Personally, I got it Wrong. As the Corona Virus started to make news, I tried to update myself on as much as possible and try to decide the future course when it came to my portfolio. The only similarity I could see is the Spanish Flu.

The American Market was the only one with reliable data I could rely upon. This was the performance of the Dow between 1918 to 1920.

At the time of the start which could be categorized as late 1917, Dow Jones was on a decline. From its peak in November 1916, it had fallen by 26% by September 1917 and fell a bit more before it bottomed out in December 1917.

In fact, by the time it ended, Dow was actually in the positive zone. Maybe this was a wrong example to look out for or maybe the impact then was smaller than its today, whatever it is, markets today are looking worse for the wear.

Yesterday, I popped this question on Twitter

https://twitter.com/Prashanth_Krish/status/1241242995300564993

Thanks for all those who responded. 

One difference or this may be due to the nature of the media is that most people are not selling out in panic with most wishing to add more given the opportunity they feel this market reaction is providing them.

What the market does is not something in our hands, but our actions are entirely in our hands. Personally, I regret being unable to exit completely at the start or even post the first gap down. Then again, I was sticking to what my System was telling me and even today, the system has not gone fully into Cash.

Recently, I was reading Stocks for the Long Run by Jeremy Siegel. In it, he narrates a interesting episode which I quote,

In the summer of 1929, a journalist named Samuel Crowther interviewed John. J. Raskob a senior financial executive at General Motors on how the typical individual could build wealth by investing in stocks.

Raskob’s idea or plan for the retail investor was that by investing just $15 a month into common good stocks, an investor could expect to grow their wealth to $80,000. 

A 24% return then as is now seemed ridiculous, but then again in the decade of 1920 to 1929, Dow had risen from a low of 64 to a high (set a few weeks after the interview) of 383. That is a compounded return of 25% per annum over 9 years. 

But like the Magazine Effect, the Interview came close to the top, a top that was not breached for 25 Years. Yet, for some one who started investing systematically based on his interview was better off than a Bond Investor in just under 4 years. What did not happen though was reaching the 60K target, it ended at 9K. 

The key to reaching our goals depends on two key factors. The amount of savings we can mobilize and invest and the returns that the said investment can generate. Equities is a preferred route for those who understand the risks over the long term, they have generally and I use the term generally because it also showcases that equities don’t work all the time, they have provided a higher return.

But when we say long term, it doesn’t mean the taxman’s definition of 1 year or even teh 3 to 5 year period used by most fund houses to sell their funds. Instead, one needs to be invested for a minimum of 10 to 15 years to reap the benefits. 

Asset Allocation has to be the key decision for a mistake here has as much an impact as picking up a lousy fund or stock. The maximum pain point you can afford to bear is not something that is easy to locate in good times, it’s only in bad times you come to know what level of exposure was okay and what was not.

If we can agree that when this all ends, we will not end up in a dystopian society or become zombies, at some point the market will settle and then bounce back. No one knows which that level is which means that all predictions are just that, predictions without any greater chance than one you can come up with using a random approach.

As I wrote in my previous post, historically markets have bottomed even before the end of the bad news. Same would be the case here too. Stick to your method, there is no better alternative as long as the method has been tested and found to be something you can come to bear.

Illusion of Safety

At the Mall I frequent to, a guard uses a hand held device to screen me – front and back. Neither he knows nor I as to what he expects. Beeping is considered normal since Belts / Pens and variety of things cause the same sound. But a illusion is created that once you are inside, you are safe.

Seat Belts and Helmets are compulsory in most cities across India and the world. But do they really make a difference or are they providing a incentive for people to risk more?

In his book, Risk, John Adams tries to showcase as how humans are comfortable with a certain level of risk and if there are new safety mechanisms introduced to reduce that risk, we take higher risk that shall match our earlier risk profile we were comfortable with.

The Risk Thermostat

A model originally devised by Gerald Wilde in 1976, and modified by Adams (1985, 1988). The model postulates that

  • everyone has a propensity to take risks
  • this propensity varies from one individual to another
  • this propensity is influenced by the potential rewards of risk-taking
  • perceptions of risk are influenced by experience of accident losses—one’s own and others’
  • individual risk-taking decisions represent a balancing act in which perceptions of risk are weighed against propensity to take risk
  • accident losses are, by definition, a consequence of taking risks; the more risks an individual takes, the greater, on average, will be both the rewards and losses he or she incurs.

The above chart showcases how we take risks and balance the same based on Rewards & Risk. Unfortunately what it doesn’t show is that Accidents which help one understand “Perceived Danger” isn’t just a stroll in the Park. When they happen, depending on the intensity can set back financial plans of years.

A part of our earnings are saved and where we save is based on multiple factors including future returns. While real estate has always been a place for investing big (dumping all savings plus taking a load of loans), it was only in the years from 2004/05 to 2012/03 that things went crazy.

Doubling of prices became a norm and investments that became 10x in under 10 years a reality. Yet, here we are with prices going nowhere (not yet South other than a few panic driven sales) and lot of projects stuck without being completed.

Mean Reversion is a concept that many don’t understand but holds itself true almost everywhere you go. Gold had a fabulous few years and while we continue to buy, the price is going anywhere but up. Its been 5 years and we are still 15% away from the price we saw in 2012.

Gold tripled in price between 2007 – 2012 but for anyone investing in 2012 expecting similar returns, he surely would be sorely disappointed.

With Gold and Real Estate not delivering returns, the only other logical choice of investments have been the stock market. Where gold left off, Equities have picked up from there.

Last five years have been very good for market and I am not speaking about India alone. Almost every other country is on a unprecedented bull run. Mutual funds have seen good times, but this time around, the rush is crazy for even fund managers to wonder if it makes sense to keep investing or better to close funds for fresh investments.

Since Modi came to power, Retail investors have plunged in big time investing their savings in Equity and Debt Mutual Funds (70% in Equity Funds, 24% in Debt, 4% in Balanced funds, 1.5% in ETF’s and 0.5% in Fund of Funds).

This in-turn has driven up valuations big time though thanks to timely changes by the Index Management committee’s, we still aren’t at 2008 highs not to mention 2000 peaks.

There is optimism in the air and why not – equities have been delivering returns even though underlying companies aren’t really able to deliver on Analyst expectations. And the best part is that despite all the hype, we aren’t even close to bubble territory kind of move.

Mergers and Acquisitions start hitting peaks as Optimism grows irrationally and yet we are still at a stage where one hears about more companies cutting down dead wood than buying new forests. Bubbles need easy money for Promoters to do stupid things.

These days, with Public Sector Banks reeling under Non Performing Assets, they are lucky if they aren’t being squeezed out. Those caught with loans more than what they can afford are trying to unload assets as quickly as they can.

Reliance Energy wanting to sell its Crown Jewel, JP Associates selling off its Cement Plants or they wishing to sell their prime jewel, the Yamunna Expressway, Tata’s literally giving away part of their Telecom business for Free – these aren’t the things you hear if there is a lot of unbridled optimism in the Air.

When a asset class becomes too expensive, the immediate thought is that the only way it could go is for a Crash to happen and in a way, the stock market has been a excellent candidate. Every-time we got over-valued, we have crashed and the next time won’t be any different.

Yet, not all mean reversion happens by way of price crash. Time correction is another way for markets to decompress valuations till they reach the mean (or rather mean meets the price).

When Gold reached its peak in 2012, a investor who got in at the lower end in 2003 was looking at a impressive CAGR return of 24.5%. Today, the same investor if he held to the asset has a CAGR of 9.80% – a okay kind of returns.

Assume gold stays around same place or makes a all time high 5 years from now. A investor who bought and held for the 15 years (remember, buying was at bottom) would be seeing a CAGR of 7.60%. These days, Banks give out as much and that return without a iota of Risk.

Markets have had a wonderful run in the past few years – the future though is uncertain (as it is all the time). Valuations are expensive yet we aren’t close to bubble territory. Foreign Institutional selling is being easily absorbed. We saw that in late 2007 as well, but Mutual fund investments were never so strong at that point of time.

Time based corrections remove the panic but depress the returns. If you are planning your life based on the past returns, maybe its time for you to take a quick rain check. Its never too late to keep some powder dry for no matter how good you think you are, you don’t want to be in a place like Tata Tele found itself.

The illusion of safety in Mutual Funds can make one take risks higher than what he ideally should. Keep track of your Allocation and stay away from exposure that you cannot digest in the next fall – whenever it comes.