Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the nimble-builder domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the restrict-user-access domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($limit) of type int is deprecated in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/add-meta-tags/metadata/amt_basic.php on line 118
Portfolio Yoga - Part 18

Chart: Savings in Expense Ratio

Everything Is Relative said Albert Einstein. In stock markets, this is done by way of Bench marking our performance against another Portfolio. In the United States, ETF assets have grown at a compounded rate of 25% in the past decade as investors have shifted big time from Active Funds to Passive driven by consistent under performance by Active funds against the Benchmark Indices.

While the flow into ETF’s in the US is into the Top 500 stocks, in India much of the flows is into the Top 50 stocks. Having said that, the interesting data point to not here is that the returns of Nifty 500 since its Inception actually matches that of Nifty 50.

Performance of Nifty 50 vs Nifty 500 since Inception of Nifty 500

The biggest advantage of Passive is the savings on Fees which over time can be a huge. If you were to start your investment journey and save say a Lakh of Rupees for Retirement per year and add another Lakh per year which goes up by 6% every year, this is the difference between paying 0.10% or 1.25%  which is the approximate average of Direct Mutual Fund Fees versus Regular Mutual Fund Expense Ratio which is around 2.25% over a period of 30 years.

Comparing the Life time Expense (based on current expense ratios)

The differential itself is pretty incredible. Where is paying 3.60 Lakhs versus paying 45 Lakhs or 81 Lakhs. If you are investing in Large Cap funds, it makes very little sense to invest into any Mutual Fund and yet the truth is that 20% of Equity Mutual Funds are Large Cap oriented.

While on Twitter we find a lot of ETF warriors, the issue lies with the fact that financial products are more of a Push Product than Pull. This means that some-one has to paid to sell mutual funds or ETF’s or Insurance or for that matter any other product that asks for your savings.

ETF’s despite their growing popularity are an abandoned child. The biggest advantage of Mutual Funds lie in not just their commission model that allows others to benefit from the sales but also the fact that there is a fund manager who you can point fingers to in case of under-performance.

In case of the ETF, there is none other than maybe a couple of Fee only Advisors.

With RIA’s rules getting changed in favor of the big boys, I doubt this shall change. The benefits will be limited to the few while the majority will continue to pay a higher fee for a inferior product that serves them better neither on Return or on Risk.

Killing the Small Advisor

First they came for the Stock Brokers, and I did not speak out –

Because I was not a Stock Broker

Then they came for the Portfolio Managers, and I did not speak out –

Because I was not a Portfolio Manager

Then they came for the Advisers, and I did not speak out –

Because I was not a Adviser

Then they came for me, the Investor – and there was no one left to speak for me


With due apologies to  Martin Niemöller

SEBI was instituted to safeguard the interest of investors, but the way its acting in recent times makes one wonder if there will be any investor left to safeguard at the end. 

Like any other professions out there, the financial services industry has seen a large number of bad apples. In an effort to remove those bad apples, SEBI is in recent times trying to implement the policy of kill a fly with a cannon. 

While there have been a lot of good moves in terms of regulation with respect to Stock Brokers, the high level of compliance costs and the falling revenues from transactions has meant that brokerage industry is now dominated by a handful of companies with the capital to survive. A small broker with limited abilities stands no chance today.

Portfolio Management Service (PMS) is a unique concept that is not found elsewhere in the world of finance. This was before the arrival of the Alternative Investment Funds the poor man’s alternative to Mutual Funds.

Today, with a Net-worth Requirement of 5 Crores, minimum investment of 50 Lakhs, the concept is essentially dead especially considering that your tax liability is far higher than with Mutual Funds. I wrote about this here 

The small investors who were once serviced by small stock brokers are today advised by either a Registered Investment Advisor or a Mutual Fund Agent. 

SEBI has now floated a Consultation Paper on Review of Regulatory Framework for Investment Advisers

Before we get into the paper, let’s try to understand what a Registered Investment Advisor {RIA} can do and cannot do. A RIA can advice his clients for a fee on creating personalised Portfolios using mix of Equity,  Debt and Funds, Asset Allocation and provide Financial Planning services.

What he cannot do is offer execution or directly manage the monies of clients or sell products where he shall receive a commission for his efforts. Of course, the rules are for those who follow and as I wrote in my post, SEBI is sleeping while the regulations are openly flouted

Today and even tomorrow, all it requires for one to sell intra-day tips is a database of phone numbers. Most of them I doubt even go through the registration process that SEBI has put in place let alone adhere to them.

The number of RIA’s that offer Financial Planning is barely a handful in number with most RIA licenses being used to offer Portfolio Advisory which is more simpler and easy to sell. But portfolio’s are not designed with regard to one’s own risk temperament nor is there advice on how much of one’s assets should be invested in what kind of allocation. 

Both of these fall into the bracket of a financial planner who places a lot of time and effort to understand your requirements, get a hold on your limitations and plan the most optimal investment portfolio that suits both your goals and yet doesn’t require to take more risks than what you can bear.

Portfolio Advisory on the other hand doesn’t require a deeper understanding of the client’s financial abilities or even his risk temperament. The advisor is offering a portfolio which is sold on a certain attribute and one that is designed for the do-it-yourself investor who understands the market.

RIA unfortunately clubs both of them in the same bracket even though the type of clients they are different with different set of requirements. Since RIA’s who are individuals are prohibited from providing execution services (Corporate entities can offer execution facilities under a separate company and while this is not to be compulsory, we all know how this works)

A while back, SEBI raised the minimum net-worth requirement for Mutual Funds from 10 Crores to 50 Crores. Next it raised the net-worth requirement of PMS from 2 Crores to 5 Crores. Through this consultation paper, SEBI wishes to raise the Net-worth to 50 Lakhs. While its 10 Lakhs for Individuals with clients lower than 150, given the prices that client can bear, 150 clients with its attendant costs {Office Space, at least 1 employee, etc} means that you barely break-even at 150.

SEBI’s recent thought process seems to be that if you are Rich, you won’t pull wool over people’s eyes. The reason I say this is because Net-worth is basically a deposit that is kept at your end and one that can at best provide you a risk free return. It does nothing to benefit either your working requirement (since you cannot use it to buy assets that depreciate) or the client.

When we try to analyze securities, we try to look for companies that have a Return on Capital Employed greater than 20%. Here, your capital of 50 Lakhs will be basically offering a return of 7%. Since this cannot be used for setting up a new office or employing others, basically this is a dead investment. This is true even in case of PMS or Mutual Funds.  

To add to the misery, the Consultation paper requires some serious investment and monitoring to ensure that in case of a dispute, you are in the clear. SEBI is attempting to do by asking for all conversations to be recorded. This is already happening at the stock broker level and is not new, but adds another layer of cost especially since these records have to be saved for 3 years. While cloud has ensured cheaper storage space, it’s still an additional cost not to talk about ensuring that these files remain secure since it impacts clients privacy.

What is also interesting, though this is not a new requirement is the primacy given to a degree. While we have no standardized way to test the aptitude of an advisor, exams like CFA / CMT and CFP have been recognized worldwide as a good way to filter out candidates. The NISM exam is really a very low hanging fruit and one that can be cleared easily by even those without a deep understanding of finance. 

A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first and honest people are screwed first

Chanakya

SEBI seems to reckon that if you are honest you should be Rich. Given the lack of financial literacy in India, we want more qualified Individuals to embrace the world of advice but by overreaching, SEBI may end up doing the very opposite of what it has set out to do – help the small investor.

Lack of good Investment Advisors is already resulting in mis-selling of products that are not suitable for the investor but yield a good commission to the seller. By enforcing very high standards, SEBI will essentially kill the ecosystem that has just started to blossom. I doubt this is SEBI’s intention though.

Breaking Trust – The Franklin Experience

When it comes to Trust, there is only one quote that is evergreen and that of course comes from the Sage of Omaha

 “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you’ll do things differently.”

Warren Buffett

Debt funds in recent times have been in the news for all the wrong reasons. While the reason for investors choosing Debt funds were due to tax arbitrage, they have been in recent times been more surprised on the negative side than the positive.

One of the best performing funds in recent times has been from the Franklin Stable. The Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund – Super Institutional Plan recently had a one year return of 10% – something that was unmatched among its peers.

But like the Taleb quote of Turkey and 1001 days, the whole advantage offered by the fund came crashing down on 16th of January 2020.

Writing off the whole Vodafone exposure may seem prudent even though there is no default for it ensures that investors who are aware of the risks don’t scoot away with the return forcing the fund to sell other good quality assets which would raise the weight of the Vodafone exposure. But by preempting, it also avoids side-pocketing which means that those who have taken the hit don’t have exclusive benefits if Vodafone returns the money it has borrowed.

Since the incidents of defaults started impacting debt mutual funds started, I started to think about whether it made sense to even look at Alpha in funds. Based on my own risk profile, I decided to henceforth move funds more into Liquid of PPFAS or Quantum, the only two liquid funds that don’t have credit risks and at the same time moved a bit more of the assets into Equity.

Afterall, if I am to take risks of a nature that came with Equity funds, I better have the upside of Equity as well. The one year return for UTI Credit Risk fund for example is -15%. Losing 15% in Equity is acceptable, in Debt, it’s a death knell. 

While my own debt investments are fairly diversified (10% approximately per fund), one fund that I gave the benefit of the doubt regardless of my view of the portfolio was the Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund – Super Institutional Plan. It was a leap of faith in the ability of the fund manager to extract himself from very sticky investments he loves to invest.

That leap of faith unfortunately has been shattered, not because he has taken a writeoff on the Vodafone but the way it has been taken. Vodafone for all its current misery isn’t dead, at least for now. The write off of the debt is based on the view that its unlikely to repay a cent. 

My own belief in the fund came from their own past. In 2016, Franklin Funds were holding debt papers of Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. On 15 February 2016, Crisil downgraded JSPL’s debt rating to BB+/A4+, from BBB+/A3+. On 29th February 2016, the funds exited the whole investment with fund investors taking a 32.5% hair-cut. The buyer of the troubled bonds was none other than  Franklin Templeton AMC.

Of course, even then there was a controversy whether fund investors should have taken a 25% haircut or 32.5% cut since the buyer and the seller were basically the same. But that was any day better than writing off the investment by 100%.

As an adviser, I had a clear view of most fund houses when it came to debt funds. One fund where I did not have was Franklin and that has been now set to rest. The King is Dead, Long Live the King

Small Caps are Down or Are they?

In today’s edition of Business Line, Aarati Krishnan tries to explore the gap between Large Cap and Small Cap and comes up with a few suggestions. While suggestions are valid, I think the reasons themselves lie elsewhere.

Let’s start with the chart plotting the relative movement of Nifty 50 (Large Cap), Nifty Mid Cap 100 and Nifty Small Cap 100 from 2018 for this dichotomy started then.

While Nifty 50 has generated an absolute positive return of 16%, in the same duration the Mid Cap lost 19% and the Small Cap 35%. Lets go a bit backward in time – 2013 August when this bull rally actually got started.

Suddenly the chart doesn’t appear so dichotomous. Nifty Midcap is the clear winner followed by Nifty 50 and Nifty Small Cap with more or less similar returns. Isn’t it amazing how the narrative can be changed by just changing the time frame we view.

Institutions are skeptical of buying small cap stocks for two reasons. 

  1. Liquidity: Mutual Funds, Hedge Funds and even Insurance funds are investing funds that one day needs to be returned back. For Mutual Funds, they need to be able to arrange for the liquidity on the same day as the request from the client flows in. This means that while they can risk being locked into low liquid stocks for a small part of the portfolio, for a large part, they are more comfortable with high liquid stocks that can be sold without having to crater the price.
  1. Corporate Governance: Indian companies, even the large cap ones are the best examples of good corporate governance. The risk multiplies manifold when we look at small cap stocks. There are barely any adequate checks and balances which mean that the promoters more often than not are able to get away with decisions that could have a positive impact on their own pockets while having a negative impact on the company.

Indian Markets for all our chest thumping is fairly small. In the United States, any company with a market Capitalization of less than 1 Billion USD is considered a small cap and those below 300 Million USD, Microcap.

From Screener.in, I was able to get market capitalization data for 3800 Companies. Of these, just around 275 companies have a market cap greater than 1 Billion USD. Another 200+ would qualify as Small Cap and the rest, 3300+ companies are microcap.

It’s not so much of a surprise that most mutual funds are concentrated only in the top 300 stocks. Lower you go in market cap, Lower your ability to exit easily. Of the 3300+ companies with market cap of 2000 Crores or below, 2700+ companies have free foat (non-promoter) holding market cap of 100 Crores or below. Basically, much of the small cap universe is nano cap and one where you cannot enter and exit with even a basic capital of a few lakhs per day.

Another 270+ companies have free float market cap between 100 Crore and 250 Crore, 186 between 250 and 500 and 120 between 500 and 1000 Crores. Remember, we are talking just about the non promoter holding and often there are corporate houses that seem to hold a substantial quantity and ones that never seem to be liquidated. The real liquid shares which can be categorized as those held by Individuals with share capital upto Rs. 2 Lacs is very small.  

Another big risk when it comes to small cap universe is the risk of delisting. Every year, a large number of small cap stocks are delisted to never make it back again. A company that gets delisted becomes a dead investment for the investor for he has no way to liquidate his investment even though the company in many cases are that continue to exist. 

Investors are attracted to small cap stocks due to the supposed cheapness of the stock though most stocks are cheap for a reason. Very few small caps are able to break through and become midcaps and an even smaller number become large cap. Identifying them at a microcap stage is literally impossible for 99% of investors.

Today when small caps are down  big time from their all time high, it appears to be cheaper but that is missing the forest for the trees. Most trees are down because there is very low probability they can survive let alone thrive. If you are a small investor, your best bet in small cap would be via a small cap mutual fund rather than actively investing unless you have the deep knowledge and experience that is required for such investing.

Chart: Nifty Performance every Decade

1990’s – Harshad Mehta, India Liberalization, P V Narasimha Rao

Best Year: 1990
Worst Year: 1995

2000 – Ketan Parekh, India Shining, Manmohan Singh

Best Year: 2009
Worst Year: 2008

2010 – 2G Spectrum, Rise of Mutual Funds, Narendra Modi

Best Year: 2014
Worst Year: 2011

Reading – 2019

I have always been someone who loved reading books. During school days it was fiction – I liked Hardy Boys and The Three Investigators. As I grew up, it was Stephen King, Robert Ludlum among others. My all time favorite for a very long time though remained Tintin Comics.

Somewhere down the line I stopped reading and I did that at a time when in hindsight I should have read more. I did read a lot of articles on subject matters that interested me but I now know that books would have helped better since it provides a better framework to understand and learn.

A structured way of learning can compress what essentially would take years or even decades into a smaller time-frame.

There are literally millions of books that cover every subject you can think about but not everyone is a great read. Many great reads though require a deeper perspective, one that you may not have been acquainted with when you read the book in the first place. I now understand what people are saying when they say, I shall re-read the book once again. 

While fiction can be read over a weekend at best, reading books on any subject matter requires much greater time for they require deep focus (something I sorely lack). That hasn’t stopped me from buying good books based on recommendations from people I trust and of course Amazon reviews.

Here is the list of some of the books I bought in 2019 (have read some start to end, skimmed a a few and hope to revisit them in the future).

Inside the Investments of Warren Buffett: Twenty Cases by Yefei Lu

Category: Fundamental Analysis

While Warren Buffett himself has not written a single book, there are hundreds of them with each author trying to dissect his methodologies and what made him click. In this book, Yefei Lu tries to get an understanding of how he choose the companies by looking at the Balance Sheets of the companies at the time when Warren bought into them.

The choice of 20 companies I believe is based on Warren’s famous 20-idea punch card. Its a good book but one that requires some amount of understanding with respect to fundamental analysis but even if you aren’t an accountant is still a good read on how to choose good companies.

The Go–Go Years: The Drama and Crashing Finale of Wall Street′s Bullish 60s 

Category: Financial History

Financial shenanigans isn’t new. Its been there in the past, is there currently and will be seen in the future regardless of the number of laws that are passed or better understanding by investors. John Brooks who has several interesting books to his credit wrote this book

This book focusses on the 10 years between 1960 and 1970. What is so special about that period you may ask and the answer is in what happened later. The US markets were in full steam going into the 60’s. The high just before the crash that led to the great depression had been crossed over in 1955 and markets were well and truly in a euphoric rally. 

Dow began 1960 at 680 and by crossed the 1000 barrier by 1966. A 50% rise in markets may not seem that great but this came on top of 300% rise in the preceding decade. While the 1965 high was breached a couple of times, such breaches ended in failure and it was only in 1982 that the high was well and truly broken to be never seen again.

Indian Stock Markets haven’t seen long periods of consolidation. Yet, if the coming future is showcasing a slower growth environment while our valuation remain high, the only outcome is a long time based correction. 

This book as Michael Lewis in the foreword writes is not about markets themselves as much as they are about morality tales of the most outlandish events of the 1960’s.

Book of Value: The Fine Art of Investing Wisely

Category: Fundamental Analysis

I have more of less frozen the framework I use to build a portfolio of stocks using the Momentum factor. One factor that keeps interesting me and one that I feel can add value is creating a Value based portfolio. This book was bought based on recommendation of a good friend who is for lack of a better word, Value Oriented.

The Author, Anurag Sharma is an Associate Professor Management at the Isenberg School of Management. In this book, he tries to provide a framework on how to go about building a portfolio of stocks – a Core Portfolio.

The Author believes that while information overload is fast becoming a problem for investors, the bigger problems arise from emotional and psychological vulnerabilities. 

One interesting chapter is “Investing as a Negative Art”. This is more inline with Mungers famous quote, Invert, always Invert. The chapter focuses on the importance of defining a criteria to use for disconfirming investment thesis.

The Bubble Economy: Japan’s Extraordinary Speculative Boom of the ’80s and the Dramatic Bust of the ’90s

Category: Financial History

Passive Investing is the current rage but what are the risks of buying and holding the index. As we have seen with Dow Jones and many other Indices, markets can remain flat for a long period of time. Do you know for instance that FTSE today is at 7600. The high it reached in 2000 was 6950.

Yes, we are comparing a developed economy with an emerging one, but such risks exist everywhere. Japan on the other hand has been a different kind of markets altogether. Nikkei hit a high of 39K in 1989. In 2009 at the height of the financial crisis, the Index was close to breaking 7000. A fall of 82% from its high.

Christopher Wood’s book is one of the best that traces both the boom and the bust. An example from the book shows the excesses of the market. Nomura, the world’s largest stock broking firm then was at its peak was valued in excess of the total market cap of many companies. In a way, we are seeing something similar today with just Apple and Amazon having more market capitalization that entire stock markets of countries. 

India has been for a while now seeing the fruits of the excesses of the earlier years when loans were disbursed and property prices escalated beyond what most people have the ability to bear. Japan was an extraordinary case but it holds lessons on how excesses can result in mountains of bad loans, economy in recession and scandals.    

The Z Factor: My Journey as the Wrong Man at the Right Time

Category: Autobiography

As the Essel Empire slowly but seems to be surely going under, this is a good book to understand how he came to become India’s Media giant. Lots of interesting tidbits such as

https://twitter.com/Prashanth_Krish/status/1093161838924066816

The Predators’ Ball: The Inside Story of Drexel Burnham and the Rise of the JunkBond Raiders

Category: Financial History

In the United States,  just two companies have a AAA rating as of August 2019: Microsoft (MSFT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). In contrast to US, in India we have dozens of companies with AAA rating, a rating that allows them a competitive advantage in their ability to borrow cheaply. For the credit companies, there is very little if any risk is things go bad. IL&FS went from being AAA to default. SEBI fined them 25 Lakhs, peanuts in the scheme of things

India despite having a large number of companies which are essentially high risk doesn’t have a junk bond market. An active junk bond would allow companies to diversify their ability to borrow other than from Banks and NBFC’s. For investors, it can provide a higher return opportunity for taking a higher risk.

The US Junk bond market was popularized by Michael Milken who found an opportunity to enable small and high risk companies an ability to borrow from the markets. He did this when working at Drexel Burnham Lambert. This book is about the rise and fall of he and the company.

What started out as an endeavor to generate fees soon turned to greed as access to information and insider-trading took root. The book is an interesting read on the path and the people involved.   

Trivia: Twitter is preparing to debut in the Junk Bond market with a $600 million deal at a yield of around 4.5%

One Hundred Years on Wall Street: Investment Almanack

Category: Financial History

I had written a review of the same here 

The Mind and the Market: Capitalism in Western Thought

Category: Economic History

While the book itself is around 400 pages, its deep on the thought of interaction between Capitalism and market as it tries to answer the question of moral, political, cultural and economic ramifications. From  Voltaire and Adam Smith to Marx, Hegel and Keynes, the book touches upon a lot of views on the utility and purpose of markets. 

Devil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation

Category: Financial History

Speculation is as old as the hills. This book hence starts from Speculation in the Roman Empire. Did you know for instance that in 1351 (at a time when Muhammad bin Tughluq was the Sultan of Delhi), Venice introduced a law against rumours intended to sink the price of government bonds. 

While we have all heard about the Tulip Mania, the book showcases the Canal (Stock) Mania and the Rail Mania. The Canal Mania came about because of the high Return on Equity (as much as 50%) generated by the earlier Canals. The bubble burst due to the outbreak of the French Revolution. Return on Equity dropped from 50% to 5% leaving many a Canal without the ability to pay a return to its shareholders.

On the positive side though, many of the Canals that were built using such funds exist to this day. While the investors suffered, the permanent infrastructure would have yielded to others returns multiple times the Investment. The Railway Mania which followed the Canal one lived a bit longer but died similarly. But once again the gainer was general public with more than 8000 miles of rails in Britain having been laid. Britain at that point had the highest density of railways in the world. 

Warren Buffett’s Ground Rules: Words of Wisdom from the Partnership Letters of the World’s Greatest Investor

Category: Investment Management

The only reason I bought this book was to understand Warren Buffett before he bought Berkshire Hathway. Very little is known about his partnership days, partnerships where he had enormous success and one quite different from what he said or did in his later years.

The book is named after the Ground Rules Buffett wrote up when he formed his first partnership. 

“These are the ground rules of my philosophy. If you are in tune with me, then let’s go. If you aren’t, I understand”

The 5th Rule is something that every few fund managers of today let alone of those days would even bring up to a prospective client. The Rule was as follows

While I much prefer a five-year test, I feel three years is an absolute minimum for judging  performance. It is a certainty that we will have years when the partnership performance is poorer, perhaps substantially so, than the Dow. If any three-year or longer period produces poor results, we all should start looking around for other places to have our money. An exception to the latter statement would be three years covering a speculative explosion in a bull market.

In other words, Buffett felt that if a client gave him a 3 year timeframe and if evenpost that he was under-performing, they would be better off investing elsewhere. While the Index was the benchmark, Buffett felt that he should be performing at least 10% better than the Index to justify the risks of active investing.

In these days of Concentrated Portfolio vs Diversified Portfolio, here is Warren Buffett’s advice in the late 90’s which he delivered to a group of students

If you can identify six wonderful businesses, that is all the diversification you need. And you will make a lot of money. And I can guarantee that going into a seventh instead of putting more money into your first one is gotta be a terrible mistake. Very few people have gotten rich on their seventh best idea. But a lot of people have got gotten rich with their best idea. So, I would say for anyone with normal capital who really knows the business they have got into, six is plenty and I {would} probably have half of [it in] what I like the best. 

One interesting facet of his partnerships he ran for 10 years, he never had a down year. 

Risk Game: Self Portrait of an Entrepreneur

Category: Autobiography

As real estate developers in India unravel in a web of leverage and unsold apartments, this book by a US developer provides an interesting perspective on the risk and travails of real estate development. 

Francis J. Greenburger was finally able to pull if off, but just one project 50 West could have derailed all that he had achieved in the decades past. While it speaks of perseverance, it also is about ability to convince others and of course the role of luck. As with any other Autobiography, he does go overboard on his own wisdom and knowledge sometimes but given that this is his book and his achievement, I would give it a pass for the ability to learn about his life and how he overcame the odds.

The Rebel Allocator

Category: Investment Management

How do you distill the important facets when it comes to analyzing a business and yet make it a lovely read. Well, that is what the author has achieved here. While the focus is on learning, it doesn’t involve deep maths yet does touch upon a lot of philosophy more than once. For instance,

“Throughout your life, you should follow your own inner scorecard.  What does that mean? Don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what other people think of you.  Progress is only accomplished by those who are stubborn and a little weird. It’s easier said than done, but if you stay true to your own principles and follow your own inner scorecard, it’s your best shot at happiness”

There are very interesting insights on what type of companies survive and thrive for the long run and which don’t. Using a picture, it showcases that companies that thrive are those that make a profit while at the same time providing value which seems higher than the price of the product making it attractive to the end customer.

************************************************************************

I am not a compulsive reader yet thanks to the easy availability of books, its attractive to buy those that seem interesting based on the reviews of others. In addition to the above, I have in recent past purchased a few more but haven’t been able to read.

Even if you are not a big reader, I would recommend buying books that seem interesting or have been recommended by well meaning friends. There will be a day when you are bored with Social Media and Television and on such days, books can be a good friend if it’s easily available.

A book, especially non fiction is basically years of knowledge of the author compressed into a small digestible version in print. That being available for the cost of a Starbucks Coffee is cheap beyond imagination. For me the biggest benefit has been the ability to distinguish Bull Shit from what is not. In the world of finance, this gives me a nice edge when it comes to investing.

The curious case of Agro Phos India Ltd

Agro Phos India came out with an IPO offering of 5,880,000 equity shares of face value of ₹10 aggregating up to ₹12.94 Crores. The issue price of the IPO is ₹19 to ₹22 Per Equity Share. Being a SME, this would be listed on the SME segment of the National Stock Exchange.

Stock was listed at a small premium and quickly went below the offer price but not by much where it remained for nearly a year. The stock started to ramp up in October of 2018. <SME Chart>

Agrophos Chart when it was trading in the SME Segment

As the chart above shows, the stock after another brief period of consolidation continued its upward rise till it got promoted to the main board in March of 2019. On the main board, it climbed a bit but not much till mid September when something really kicked off.

The stock started to climb vertically at a 45Degree angle. The surprising thing about this rise has been the delivery volumes. Between the 16th of September to 26th of December when it fell 20%, the stock had a delivery volume of 1.57 Crores.

Action post listing on the Main Board

The public shareholding as of 30th September is 92 Lakhs of which only 75 lakhs are in Demat Mode. Individual Shareholders actually hold just around 50 Lakhs. Basically the total delivered volume is 3 times what retail holds

Rare are occurrences where such huge delivery activity comes up even as the stock keeps moving higher every single day. General pump and dump has always been with very little stock being delivered. Wonder if I am missing something here