Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the restrict-user-access domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: Class Jetpack_Geo_Location is deprecated since version 14.3 with no alternative available. in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($limit) of type int is deprecated in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/add-meta-tags/metadata/amt_basic.php on line 118
Uncategorized | Portfolio Yoga - Part 9

When not to throw the towel

Strategies are dime a dozen in markets. While broadly speaking, we have 3 major strategies – Fundamental / Technical and Quantitative, each of them in-turn have more strategies than your fingers can count. And best of all, each and almost every strategy has its day in the Sun. What it means is that I can always pick and choose as to why this strategy is something that should be followed using my knowledge of Hindsight bias, Selection Boas and Survivor Bias.

But if one dig’s a bit deeper, one can see why many a strategy are not worth pursuing. Most fail and ironically they fail at the exact moment you need them to support your cause.

It does not matter how much one reads about having the discipline to stick to a strategy come hell or high water, its easy for us to find ourselves vulnerable to the very Greed and Fear which we are told to overcome. My own belief is that the more we understand our system better, the higher the chance that we will stick when the going is bad so as to enable us to make the best of it when the turnaround comes.

Take a strategy such as Trend following for example. While on one hand it seems pretty simplistic and easy to follow, the truth is that trend following is a difficult way to make money in markets. Most strategies of trend following nature have a negative win-loss record (in other words, more losses than wins). While a strategy is good if it has positive expectancy and beats the underlying on a Buy & Hold basis, that in itself counts for nothing when the chips are down.

Most trend following systems not only have a inferior win loss ratio but also has a distinct disadvantage in terms of serial losses. Most systems I have tested have serial losses of 8 or more (13 in one instance). While numbers alone do little justice to the pain, just think about it as falling down 13 times in a row while in a marathon race. Not only every competitor you see has moved forward (one never sees behind, its always forward :P), but one now has to recover from the self inflicted (as our mind tends to make us believe) injuries.

Its in these depressing and dark times that most people lose their nerve and abandon their strategy, a time which in hindsight shall prove was when they should actually have been loading up for the good times ahead. But at the moment when the decision was made, it looks like the best decision under the said circumstances.

So, the question is, how to overcome such repeated acts of omission and commission owing to our inability to overcome many of our heuristic biases?

To me, the best way is to understand in depth the vulnerabilities of the strategy we choose to apply. No strategy provides a one way road to riches and in markets, unless you are a seller of a tip service, you cannot have a strategy that has a 99% win record. Once you have understood the philosophy and its draw-backs, the “throwing in the towel” will not happen as regularly as before.

For instance, if your back-test has shown that your worst streak was a 13 trade loss, you will need to stay with it and not lose sleep when you hit the 7 trade mark since this is something that has happened and should be expected too. Heck, since I believe (and have using OOS samples found evidence) that the worst draw-down is the one in the future one should expect even that high number of 13 to be broken forward sometime in the future.

Once you know and prepare for your worst case scenario, you know that you have reduced your ability to fail at the crucial moment to a very small degree, something that you can control.

This time its different #Nifty

After weeks of nightmares about how to fund today’s Marked to Market margin, Bears finally had something to be happy with Nifty cracking by 1.3% by end of day. While a 1% fall in markets should be common enough, it was something that was missed in the last 24 days.

In a bull market, one is told that the best way to participate would be to buy on every dip. While it makes a lot of sense in theory, the question is how to apply it practically. After all, how does one know whether we have seen that dip or not.

Unlike most pundits on Twitter and Television, I do not have a crystal ball to say where one should Buy or Sell. On the other hand, with the help of some Statistics, its possible to compare contexts with how markets have behaved historically and come to a educated guess.

Lets first start with the most basic question. Have the markets gone up too much too fast? In the last one year, markets have gone up by around 60% and considering the circumstances in which this has happened (change of government, US markets in a strong bull market, economy seeming to show signs of bottoming out among others), this is something that is acceptable. After all, markets discounts the future and markets believe the future is pretty good compared to the immediate past.

The key difference between the current bull market and the one’s we have seen previously (2000, 2003, 2009) is that those rallies were born out of pessimism. Markets had become pretty cheap (when measured via trailing Nifty PE), we started off the rallies with Nifty PE being around 10 whereas in the current instance, markets started off without being too cheap (we never dropped below 15).

Today, Nifty 4 Quarters trailing (Standalone) PE stands at 21.09 and just a few days ago tested the 1 Standard Deviation. Coincidentally, this is the same level from which markets reacted in 2003 (chart below) and while the circumstances are hugely different, some reaction from this level maybe given as per this data.

Nifty

Previous bubble burst’s have happened when Index was well over teh 2nd Standard Deviation (and pretty close to the 3rd), so in this instance, we can rule out the possibility that the current rally was a bubble and the hope that this may result in a straight line fall.

This rally has been different in a lot of ways, much of which I believe is due to the Quantitative Easing that has resulted in a flood of liquidity resulting in most markets seeing a very low historical volatility and a constant bullish undercurrent.

Take a look at the following chart for example

Nifty

The lower pane shows the number of weeks since we saw a 5% cut (on weekly). Since 2010, we have had just 1 week where markets fell by more than 5% (week ending 18th November 2011).

Now check the following chart

Nifty

Between 2003 and 2008, when Indian Markets saw their best bull markets ever, we had reactions coming in constantly. The longest period we spent without a week where we saw a 5% correction was 74 weeks (compare that to 148 weeks we are seeing currently).

As much as I believe that the future looks good, the best returns are found when we buy it cheap. The markets are not as cheap but not very expensive either which puts us in a dilemma. Take a look at the spreadsheet I had posted in July of this year

sen

As you can see, above 21, the returns over the 3 year time frame get into negative territory. Of course, this being the average, you may see a +ve returns as well, but the probability goes lower as we go higher.

Technically speaking, we have not seen a good support range appear after we broke above the previous high of 6300. Interestingly that is also a level breaking which we are sure to get into a bear market.

A 20% reaction from the current high while may not appear to be in order, we have had a draw-down of 13% (Average), something we have not seen in 2014. So, even if we were to react 10% from the high, that would mean a test of 7300 levels.

For now, fresh investing can wait till we see a moderate correction at the very least.

Process vs Outcome

A lot of things in life are based on the concept of following the right process which ensures or is said to ensure the right outcome. Study hard parents say so that you can get into the best college – a direct relationship being there between marks scored and the fact that a high score shall get one into a top notch college.

A employee works hard hoping to claim his spot when a higher position opens up or to be able to claim a higher bonus. Again a direct relationship.

In the financial markets though, such a direct relationship is always difficult to establish. Buying a good company may decrease the probability of total loss of capital but never can guarantee a good return especially when its damm difficult to really say what is a good company and what is not. In 2007, I doubt if any Analyst openly said that Bear Stearns or Lehman were bad companies. After all, Lehman was a 150+ year old company that had survived through every crash and cycle that came about in those years. Bear Stearns was a 80+ year old company.

The thought for this blog came by this article – How we made nearly $1 million on Apple stock (Link).

The story is about how a couple bet (and not a big sum) on Apple and since they have sat on it for the last 16 years have now made a fortune (or sort of depending on what you call a fortune). Nice pleasing story especially since it deals with immigrants, their emphasis on buying a good company, etc, etc.

But is it a good lesson to learn for a ordinary investor? I guess not for not only does this story has its heuristic bias faults – Survivor Bias to start with but also the investors here did break major rules relating to investing. The fact that they came out good does not make the path something others should consider to the the path of the successful.

Lets start with the fact that even after overlooking things like Taxes, the guys have not made a Million (Realized + Un-realized). But since a Million bucks sounds nice, the copy editor maybe decided, this is how I attract more eyeballs.

Coming to the faults of the investment itself. The success is the outcome of breaking two golden rules of investment.

1. Never place all your eggs in a single basket. While the report does not detail whether they had invested in other shares as well, the gist seems to be that this is their only investment – Zero Diversification. In other words, they bet their money on a single stock and it turned out to be a great investment. If it had failed (as it has for hundreds of thousands of investors), they would have lost a small sum of money (that maybe not have been even significant enough to materially change their lives).

2. Not cutting one’s losses (Stop Loss). In the aftermath of the burst of the tech bubble in 2000, the stock of Apple fell by 65% and what did our savvy investors do? Nothing. The stock fell by 61% in 2008 / 09 and once again, our investors stayed put.

This also reminds me of a the following conversation between Barry Ritholtz and James O’Shaughnessy in Bloomberg Radio’s “Masters In Business” programme.

“O’Shaughnessy: “Fidelity had done a study as to which accounts had done the best at Fidelity. And what they found was…”

Ritholtz: “They were dead.”

O’Shaughnessy: “…No, that’s close though! They were the accounts people who forgot they had an account at Fidelity.”

So, is the moral of the story being not to act and hope that the stock will eventually bounce back? I say, lack of exit strategy is one of the biggest reasons that dud shares have only retail investors as their majority investors (even the promoters bail out after a certain period of time).

Is then Buying and Forgetting the right way to deal with the volatility that comes with investments? My limited experience in markets tells me that, this cannot be true. Yes, there will be occasional stories of such success, but then again, who would want to write a story about a guy who was disciplined enough to stay with a great company that just managed to go under when the economy tumbled.

Similar stories can be read about Entrepreneurs as well. The story generally starts with how the guy started out in a Garage and now has build his company to the current multi million / billion level. What is left unsaid that 9 out of 10 ventures fail.

Luck plays a great deal in a lot of our ventures including investments in the market. The following picture by Michael Mauboussin shows the same pretty nicely.

Luck

Hind-sight is always 20/20. While much of the world looks at the results, to me, the process is as much important too.

In the field of investment, if you do not have a process, the outcome will generally be one of failure unless you are that 1 in a Million who got Lucky 🙂

One in 10,000

Impact of Social Media on Investing

The arrival of Social Media (Groups / Forums / Twitter / FB / Whatsapp among others) have proved to be a boon to the ordinary investor / trader. The impact it has on my own career is pretty significant and something that I cherish especially since I started my career before the advent (in the way it is today) of Internet.

Back in those days, information was scratchy and the only people one interacted with were those who you knew personally. And unless you were in Mumbai or a major city where investing in the markets were not looked into as a crime (comparable to any other gambling avenues), the percentage of people who knew much was rather limited (personal experience) and you had to be really lucky to be able to have them as friends.

Internet has changed those things quite a bit. Now, you can talk, question and discuss the pro’s and con’s of any company that seems to catch your fancy. Crowd-sourcing is the new mantra with one needing to just start to get others to put up their views as to what is right and what is wrong about a particular investment or strategy. In other words, one can get a peer review done literally for free and all that without having to move an inch from the computer

While the advantages of using such crowd-sourced networks for information is pretty useful, the fact also remains that its not honey and ghee all the way. The ability of such discussions to cloud our judgement is pretty huge.

Take for example the fact that most investors under-perform the indices on the long run (academic research, mostly done in US). But spend a little time and you can barely see many anything lesser than what the best fund manager has done in his best year. And most are then humble enough to point out that they are just a small – part time investor / trader.

The above scenario is true regardless of whether the writer is using his real name or writing using a Anon ID (not that either makes much difference since unless the guy really wants to meet, even with a real name, he can be as much Anon as a ID which hides the name as well). What really pisses me off is the ability of these guys to influence those who are easily swayed by opinions of others. While they themselves are barely invested (using say % of networth invested), they cause disproportionate damage to the psychology of smaller investors who are generally more scared of the markets. Of course, Darwin theory holds good here, the strongest survive while the weak shall get annihilated.

Way back in the 2000, when the IT bull run was in full fury, we had a client – a Chartered Accountant no less who was investing through our brokerage firm for quite some time. He had over time accumulated a good portfolio of stocks, most of them either in cyclic business or the general Hindustan lever / Ponds India / Broke Bond kind of MNC shares.

For much of the bull run, he was able to keep his head light on how stocks outside his portfolio (specifically IT stocks) were going like there was no tomorrow. While I do not remember the conversations I used to have with this gentleman with much clarity (its been 14 long years now), I do know that some where down the line, pressure of seeing other investors doing much better than him (heck, we had a client who could not sign his own name make a bundle in a stock called Octagon Technologies) finally broke him down. So, one fine day, he decided to swap much of his portfolio as well as invest fresh funds into a portfolio of IT stocks. While he did not enter right at the peak, he entered too close to make anything on the upside (even temporary happiness) and when the blade finally came down, his portfolio was just shattered.

While I am no longer in the brokerage business to observe things as closely as I could way back then, I do wonder how much of the crowd-sourced information can lead to investors getting out of good shares and investing into small cap stocks that are going up each day more than what many a big share does in a good month.

The FOMO risk (Fear of Missing out) has a much bigger impact on us than we consider. If everyone around you is claiming to have won in a casino and while you having the knowledge that the house always wins have so far kept afar from getting into that trap, its just a matter of time before you finally decide to take a dive. This is how most Multi Level Marketing works too and best of all when every one finds out they were suckers, they always have their friends to comfort them with stories of their own losses and that some how makes one’s losses more tolerable.

Truth be told, a lot of investors do not have the skill set to Analyse the markets and for them, the best way to participate would be via ETF’s and Mutual Funds. But even those who have some skill set, do remember that markets and life itself being cyclic, it will and never shall be a case of one strategy being the winner all the time.

A lot of investors remind me of Abhimanyu (MahaBharat). They some how know how to get in, getting out is something they sincerely think will happen as easily. If only life was so easy.

If you want to be in this field, do remember that you will need a Edge to survive, a domain expertise of some kind that enables you to distinguish between the good and the bad, the ability to know when is the time to risk more and when is the time to close out the cards. Because unless you know something, you are a sheep that is slaughtered at the end of the line. As much as following some one else’s advise may get you through for some time, when the time is up, the guy who you followed will have escaped while you will be left wondering what the hell hit you.

Winners Curse – Bharti Shipyard

Investopedia definition => A tendency for the winning bid in an auction to exceed the intrinsic value of the item purchased.

While the US sees a lot of hostile take-overs, we barely see one every few years. The last one that made big news was the take over of Great Offshore. ABG Shipyard and Bharti Shiyard were involved in a prolonged battle before Bharti Shipyard won the battle. But as the relative comparison of returns by the two stocks from day of end of battle indicates, its ABG Shipyard that actually won the War.

Since Indian laws do not require 100% of the equity to be tendered or to be accepted, those who remained with the GT Offshore seem to have done even worse.

Win

Breakout Trading and Anchoring Bias

Just today, a good friend of mine was commenting on how a lot of stocks had moved strongly higher in recent days and maybe it was not advisable to buy at current prices but instead wait for a correction before entry.

The rationale offered by my friend fits the “Anchoring Bias” perfectly. We anchor ourselves to prices that we have seen in the past and instead of analysing whether a trade is still worth at the current juncture, we tend to generally hope that we shall buy it when it comes down to a price where we supposedly missed it.

A lot of stocks come to one’s attention only after they have made some thing spectacular to merit a mention. So, the day, a stock moves above its 52 Week high is one time where in we see the stock suddenly gathering the limelight. So, instead of buying that breakout, we repent the fact that we missed the stock when it was cheaper earlier.

Let me give you a example (thanks to my 20/20 Hindsight Bias). This stock was trading between 30 and 45 for long and suddenly broke off and multiplied 5x times.

1

As can be seen on the chart above (Click on it to expand to full size), the stock saw a parabolic rise once it crossed 80 bucks. The question I would like to ask is, what would been your confidence in buying this stock at this juncture (for the moment lets assume this is a company that seems to be turning around the corner as far as fundamentals are concerned).

2

Chart of the same stock as it traded in a large band over the next few months. If you had bought, would you have held it on? If you had not bought earlier, would you be more inclined now?

3

Same question as above. Even more time spent while stock seems to have taken a break and actually declined. Would you have given up?

4

A Break-out and a failure of the same. What would you be thinking now?

5

Another breakout. Should we Buy now or wait for a re-test of the breakout?

6

The stock chart as it looks now 🙂

The thing with break-out trading is that after every failure, our next entry is higher than our earlier entry and unless you take the system as it is as opposed to using our grey cells, we shall miss out on the biggies while we get caught with endless breakout failures and finally decide that maybe breakouts aren’t the best way to trade after all.

Sensex by Day of the Year

This idea comes from Eddy Elfenbein of Crossing Wall Street fame. He has done a similar analysis on the Dow and I wanted to see what outcome would I find if I apply the same concept to the Sensex (owing to it having a much later history than CNX Nifty).

The Chart below outlines the fact that Sensex has been found range-bound from mid October to early December before we follow the Santaclaus rally that is seen in the US.

Do note since I have averaged around 34 years of data, this has not much of predictive power, but at the same time gives us a visual of how Sensex has moved over the years.

The period from mid March to early October seems to be the time when the markets have been the strongest and trending strongly.

So, without much further ado, here is the Chart 🙂

Sensex

[Click on the chart to enlarge]

Postscript: Data used for the Chart above starts from 01-01-1981 and ends at 28-08-2014