Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the restrict-user-access domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: Class Jetpack_Geo_Location is deprecated since version 14.3 with no alternative available. in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($limit) of type int is deprecated in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/add-meta-tags/metadata/amt_basic.php on line 118
Uncategorized | Portfolio Yoga - Part 4

The Techno-Funda way of Investing

For long, a concept that has gained some amount of acceptance is that by selecting stocks using a combination of Technical Analysis and Fundamental Analysis, one might be able to get much better returns compared to using either of them on a standalone basis.

I myself long back believed in such a thing to the extent that I even created a new yahoo group where I felt we could have these kind of discussions. Since I am due to give a talk to a group of friends at a Value Investing club, I decided that rather than just claim that mixing up the two would be profitable, why not test out the theory and see the results.

For the test, I chose the current set of CNX 500 components (a total of around 495 stocks). I did not run and use the output from a fundamental screen such as say the “Magic Formula Investing” simply due to non availability of the stocks that would have got chosen in 2000 (Start of Test).

I used 3 different scenario’s. In Scenario 1, I just bought 1 share each of all the companies whenever I got a signal. If that trade went into a loss (max loss of 20% from purchase price), it did not alter my position size which was kept the same for the next trade as well. Maximum Capital I envisaged that would be required, 200K.

In Scenario 2, I bought the max quantity that would be allowed based on a initial capital of 10K for each stock. If the stock had a loss trade, the next trade would have a lower quantity based on the capital left in that stocks’ account. Only Max stop of 20% from the purchase price was used.

In Scenario 3, I bought the max quantity that would be allowed based on a initial capital of 10K for each stock. If the stock had a loss trade, the next trade would have a lower quantity based on the capital left in that stocks’ account. Along with max stop loss, I also used a trailing stop of 20% from the high point it had reached.

Buy & Hold was simply buying on the first trading day and selling on the last.

The time period for all the above tests was from 1st Jan 2000 to 31st December 2014

Here are the results (Click on the image for a bigger picture)

Scen

As can be seen, Scenario 2 / Logic 2 was the best performer. Of course, the results have to be taken with a fist of salt since the stocks I used for this test were those that had survived and are currently part of the CNX 500. But since the whole test is to compare B&H vs using Technical’s, I feel that the same can be safely ignored.

What surprised me was the huge difference between the system that used Trailing stop and one that did not. I am not a strong believer of using stops since market volatility can easily take the best placed stops out, but this result was a revelation as to the damage it can create in long term. Then again, its not only psychologically tough but also makes one look stupid as well to buy a stock at 100, see it move to 1000 before getting stopped out at 80. Maybe, one needs to look at a middle path, something I hope to explore in a future blog post of mine.

Of Perma Bulls, Bears and Investors

Last month, I competed 10 years as a Stock Broker and while I am not sure about what lessons I have learnt other than the fact that I have somehow survived the tremulous times, it has given me a opportunity to observe and understand the mind set of people who walk in a broker’s office either as a Investor or as a Trader. This blog is more or less about categorizing them based on my observations

One of the key observations is that most investors are bullish (both of the right kind of bullish and the wrong kind of bullish, but that is for later) while most traders seem to be happy going short vs going long. Its these charlies who are generally caught like sitting ducks when markets move as it is doing now.

While Investors as a group are treated under a single umbrella, we can actually see that there are different classes of them. Some of them are categorized here-under

The All knowing Investor: This guys knows everything there is to know under the Sun. You talk about any company and he has a opinion about it. While the old chaps belonging to this category spend much of their time in the broker office / exchange exchanging views or rather forcing their views on others, the younger generation spends more time on FB / Twitter and Money Control Message Board where they ensure that they provide a opinion on a host of topics and stocks.

Most of these guys have a big portfolio to boot. When I say Big, I mean not in terms of money (as % of their networth invested) but in terms of number of stocks they have a position in. After all, what is the point in knowing so much without having a bit of skin in the game. So, while he studiously avoids the high priced stocks (with the mearage allocations, they can quickly clog the portfolio), they have positions (mostly in single and at most double digits) in a host of stocks. This ensures that regardless of what sector is moving, they have something to showcase.

The Nervous Investor: You can spot this guy from afar. After all, every time the market dips a couple of percentage points, he is the one who keeps asking, how much further shall it fall. Come bull market or bear market, this guy is constantly on his toes & gets rids of his stock the moment he thinks markets shall fall for whatsoever reason.

This is also the guy who explains to anyone who cares to hear about how he had bought Eicher when it was in double digits and MRF when it was in three digits. If only he had held on to them, he would have been a rich man by now.

The swinging Investor: These guys are known for their ability to talk about how India will do great during the next 50 years and how one should follow the buffett philosophy of holding for ever. But since they have this small trait of also being interested in trading, they feel that if markets going down, there is no point in holding onto good stocks. After all, the experience of 2008 showed that even good stocks can fall. So, why not take advantage of the same and reduce one’s average price.

The favorite stocks of these guys are the red hot stocks that are on every traders table. So, you find them talking about how the revival of Suzlon is just round the corner and whether GMR will be able to place its shares to that big investor. After all, there is no glory in holding onto boring stocks that move nowhere na.

The Conspiracy Theorist: These are generally perma bull investors who have invested in all the wrong shares to start with. But then again, that was not their fault to begin with. Its either that the promoters turned out to be sloppy or its just that the operators are still accumulating what they want and once done, the share will shoot up like a rocket.

They are able to find conspiracy everywhere. So, every rise is due to factors A, B or C and every fall is due to factors X, Y or Z. They have more or less boxed out everything there is to box.

The time pass Investor: You would be surprised as to how many a investor belongs to this category. For a lot of them, passing time at home is tough and this means that they come to the broker office after having breakfast and stay till lunch time when they quickly exit so that they reach home to have lunch and then a good nap.

But since brokers will not allow you to sit there, have Chai and do nothing, they have a active account with the major activity being placing orders for small quantity of shares to buy or sell prices so far away that they rarely execute. Most of their time is spent talking to other investors / traders / dealers (in other words, whomever is free to talk). Spending time in a brokers office is easy, what with accesss to news papers and television.

The Invisible Investor: And then, there are guys who are never seen in the brokers office but always talked about in the hush hush tone. The dealer who punches the order believes that this investor is a very well connected guy (Bombay Info?). After all, unlike other investors, this guy rarely bothers to call up but if he does, its a order to buy something big. Fast forward to the future and this stock has more than doubled (when the hell did that happen) and still the guy rarely is interested in selling other than on his own terms.

Brokers generally hate such clients for the single reason that not only do they make plenty of money in the market (more than what the broker usually does in his own investments), but also is a guy who does not pay much. A order once or twice a month cannot provide for the Coffee / Tea that is served daily, leave out other expenses.

And so, that ends the different classes of investors. Most guys easily fit into one box or the other. And then there is the big trading category, the guys who actually are key to running a brokerage office. Without then, it makes more sense to shut the office and give it on rent.

The thing about traders is that most of them are perma-bears. There would be a few perma bulls, but they are often the stray cattle. One reason for traders generally being bearish may owe to the fact that markets spend way less time on the way down than they take on the way up. So, if market moves X% in 3 months, it could take as less than a fortnight to level the whole rise. Making money when everyone else is loosing can be addictive. After all, it does not take one to be a genuis to make money in a bull market, but make money in a bear market and you are in a different league altogether.

While most of them lack any strategy to talk of, most have a basic understanding of charts (never mind the fact that they shall go against it most of the time). Breakouts / Opening Range Breakouts are among the few many a trader prefers. But its what they talk that is more interesting. Most are looking at the Big Picture and know for a fact that this macro event has a large impact and hence even though the markets are looking bullish right now, its time to Sell and not to Buy.

Its amazing the kind of contradictions they hold and the ability to talk their way through pure bull shit. If you were to meet the talented trader (not one who makes money), you shall be astounded by his information process and ability to place them right where it belongs (generally in the bearish camp). The fall in Crude prices for most is not a boon to the markets but a sign that the world markets are collapsing and we may see a collapse of a nature similar to 2008.

The rise in Gold is seen as a confirmation of how the big daddies of the world are preparing themselves for the imminent collapse. And boy, do they love conspiracy theories. Most know far better about the happenings in other countries (especially the troubled ones) that even the citizens of those countries themselves.

But the life of a trader is very short. More often than not, he exits the brokerage house after taking a total loss on his capital. But that in itself does not stop him. Beg, Borrow or Steal, he somehow manages to find capital (for most, its from Salary / Other Income) and start a new account at a new brokerage house (the reason for his previous loss lay in the inability of the dealer to punch in his orders remains his new thesis).

All in all, most brokers see clients as cows to milk since they know for sure that 5 years down the lane, its tough to find even 1% of the original lot. So, why bother with education goes the thinking. Advent of the online brokerage houses such as Zerodha has ensured that many a trader does not even have to move out of his house and yet get the best rates possible. But if one has no job or business, it’s insulting to be seen sitting at home and trading and hence even today, you find that most brokerage houses have a constant number of investors / traders sitting behind the dealers.

This post turned out to be way lengthy than I intended it to be. Hope you liked it 🙂

Review of Restart by Mihir Sharma

Mihir Sharma is a well known Journalist whose writings I have followed for some time now and hence when I came across his book, Restart: The last chance for the Indian Economy, it was a no-brainer to read the same. While the book seems big, it actually a pretty easy read, divided as it is into 4 main parts and multiple chapters.

Mihir spends 75% of the book (first 3 parts) outlining all that has gone wrong in India. From the multitudes of law that a small factory owner should keep track and obey to the political shenanigans that brought about a few of the big moves such as Bank Nationalisation or the half hearted start of liberalization that was kicked off in 1991.

Anyone who has read his articles knows the fact that he does like our former prime minister Manmohan Singh a lot and this book is not much different out there. Then again, since he is in the circles which had access to him, maybe he is really able to see the part that majority of us could not. But then again, we are digressing from the book.

The problem I find in the book is that Mihir seems to believe that nothing we have achieved in India counts for anything. While the gains we have made in Information Science is placed squarely at the feet of we being a country of cyber coolies, he literally accuses pharma companies of cheating one and all.

The most surprising comment of his I found was his thought that the Ranbaxy Promoters sold to the highly innocent folks at Daiichi Sankyo a “Placebo”. Mind you the fact that unlike we small share holders, the big boys who did their own due diligence which I think includes access to not just the accounts but all the factories and records got cheated because Ranbaxy as like any other “Indian” teenager who when taking a test, cheated when it could and gamed the system when it could not.

In fact, he goes further and says “We are a Nation of Plagiarists”. Isn’t it amazing that when Japan / South Korea / China / ASEAN countries started their journey towards Industrialization, they did nothing different but actually copied what was invented in the West and build it cheaply.

Xiaomi phones have been a huge hit in China and now in India. But try as you want, they are not able to sell the same sweet cheap phones in any developed nations. Wonder why?

Like any true Socialist (though I do not think he is one who believes in their ideology), he more or less seems to suggest that Indian Promoters are a unscrupulous lot. After all, haven’t most of them gamed the system to make undue gains (and once again, the King of Good times is selected for some special treatment what with a whole chapter dedicated to him). And hence his suggestion that rather than leave the field open for private and allow for true competition, he hopes that the government can act as a “Stern Parent Who Supervises Homework Closely”. Good Luck with that I say.

On one hand, he correctly points out about the fact that Banks have accumualated huge Non Performing Assets due to ir-responsibility of some business-family scion, but at the same time does not provide the way out. Today, with much of the banking sector in the hands of the government, the field is more like a Oligopoly. The fact that banks with the highest NPA can raise deposits with the same ease and rates as a Bank with the lowest NPA. This distorts the whole picture and with limited time at the top, any CMD is more interested in securing himself than take on the risk of cleaning up the books.

The final section is devoted to making suggestions about what can be done to change that. While the suggestions on the face of it are pretty good, the fact of the matter is that they are too broad in scope and literally something that seems to be setting as one to fail. After all, regardless of how efficient Modi works, even he cannot do all the things necessary to boost the growth of India in the next 4 years even as he fights one state election after next.

Like Modi, Mihir seems to believes that the easy way to prosperity is by putting up factories, not to sell to ourselves but sell to the world. China is what is is due to the fact that it has a early mover advantage and dislodging someone like that is no easy game.

After all, despite the fact that every state government is wooing IT firms with hosts of benefits, why is that most of them still prefer Bangalore (despite all its ills) to be their first choice? I was reading a article about a IT firm that currently is in Mumbai saying that its next phase of expansion will be in Bangalore since they aren’t able to get the kind of people they want to work out there.

Yes, Manufacturing is important, but with Europe slowing down and China having build up a huge surplus in capacity, it will be tough to beat them at their own game. At one point, he showcases how even Bangaladesh has run ahead of us in terms of Garment Exports. But the reasons are not just due to our laws (which are a major reason, do doubt). The 2013 Savar building collapse showed the risks that were being taken to get there. China has its famous sweat factories and regardless of how we see them, I doubt we want to be like them.

I strongly believe that India shall grow, not because of the government but in-spite of it. Yes, there are a lot of things to set right, but like Sanitation, not all can be changed or righted in a few years and that is sure to disappoint us.

While the book is pretty fast paced read, I would have loved it even more if he could have identified one major issue (say in the Financial Industry) and come out with suggestions on what are the things one could do to set things right. Then again, being a Journalist means that he wanted to touch as many a sector / area as possible without having to make concrete suggestions. After all, how many would have bought the book if it was purely one on what Ails our Banking Industry and the way to set it right.

I give the book 4 Stars out of 5

How accurate are Predictions

In markets, everyone loves to predict. Technical Analysis has quite a few tools / methods whose whole concept is the ability to forecast given certain circumstances. In a way, ability to predict is like the ability to act like God and is very very addictive. Its one thing to have a opinion of the future and quite another to predict that markets shall do this or that by this or that particular date.

In a google group called LongTermInvestors, there is this guy by name Ravi Palwankar who has gained a following based on his ability to give a date on which he expects the markets to move. The only caveat is that he does not provide the direction and hence it can either be bullish or bearish in nature.

His messages are like the one below (his most recent one)

Ravi

I came across this guy only due to following Vish on Twitter who not only provides updates as and when a new mail is posted but also has kept records of his previous predictions. Thanks to him, I could make an attempt at testing the profitability of his calls.

Since the move can be either Bullish or Bearish and also can be + or – 1 day from the day he has given, I have in the test bought a Straddle (closest strike) 2 days before the event and sold 2 days after the event. In the case, the D-2 day falls on a holiday, I have taken the previous day closing price as entry and in case the D+2 day falls on a holiday, closing price of the next trading day is taken for the calculation.

Results are as here under

Ravi-2

The sample size is pretty small and hence do take the results with a pound of Salt. But for what they are worth, it seems that shoring a straddle before the event has a better outcome than buying one.

Chart: Comparing Intra-day Range of Nifty

High volatility is supposed to be indicative of Major tops and Bottoms. With Nifty having seen one of the best rallies since 2009, a lot of bears seem to latch on to the current increased volatility as a sign of a major top in the offing.

But are we seeing higher volatility (or range in the day) than what we saw in 2007? The answer is in the chart below

Nifty

As they say, a picture says a thousand words :).

Cigarette and Investment

Today, by a sudden hunch I wanted to know what if some one who smokes had invested a equal amount of money into the shares of the leading tobacco company (ITC). How would the Investment fare and what would be the current value.

And before I say anything, let me say that I neither smoke nor have invested into ITC shares, so no point sending me the joke below 🙂

Lady: Do you smoke?
Guy: Yes I do.
Lady: How many packs a day?
Guy: 3 packs.
Lady: How much per pack?
Guy: $10.00 per pack.
Lady: And how long have you been smoking?
Guy: 15 years
Lady: So 1 pack is $10.00 and you have been smoking 3 packs a day which puts your spending per month at $900. In 1 year, it would have been $10,800. Correct?
Guy: Correct.
Lady: If 1 year you spend $10,800, not accounting for inflation, the past 15 years puts your spending total at $162,000. Correct?
Guy: Correct.
Lady: Do you know if you hadn’t smoke, that money could have been put in a step-up interest savings account and after accounting for compound interest for the past 15 years, you could have by now bought a Ferrari?
Guy: Oh. Do you smoke?
Lady: No.
Guy: Then where’s your fucking Ferrari?

Of course, there are several caveats in such a study. For instance, there are smokers who smoke a stick or two a day and then there are those who smoke 2 or even 3 packs a day. To be conservative, I took a smoker who smoked around 5 cigarette a day and did not smoke on week ends. That comes to a neat 10 packs per month.

I tried searching for data on what ITC charged per cigarette over the years but could not find any such statistic. Good friend Kora Reddy came to my aid with the starting number (1995). Since I know the current price, I just incremented the price over the years (CAGR of around 12.5%). This is clearly not the true price, but definitely something that could be used for the test.

ITC has over the years given Bonus as also split the face value of the stock. Since that would complicate things too much, I used adjusted data (adjusted for Splits / Bonus but not for Dividends). In 1995, ITC was traded physically and getting odd lot shares may have been tough. And prices would definitely not be the one I used (post split), but, once again, idea is to get a rough number than a very accurate one.

The concept was simple. When you buy say 10 packs for the month, you also buy shares for the same amount. So, in affect, every time one smokes a pack of cigarette, the amount that gets debited is more or less equal to 2 packs.

Starting from 1995 till end of 2014, I assumed a person would have smoked around 2400 packs (10 per month * 12 months * 20 years). The total amount spent on that comes to around 82,500.

If the same amount was invested in ITC shares, he would have bought approximately 1316 shares. If one uses the last investment price (Dec 1, 2014), the value of his portfolio comes to around 4.79 Lakhs. Since the investment is staggered over such a long period, using XIRR, I get a return of 19.97%. That is actually better than Gold or Nifty. Food for thought, eh?

So, the next time you buy a pack or carton of cigarette’s do think about calling your stock broker as well. Who knows, you may actually end up a millionaire due to your bad habit.