Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the restrict-user-access domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: Class Jetpack_Geo_Location is deprecated since version 14.3 with no alternative available. in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($limit) of type int is deprecated in /home1/portfol1/public_html/wp/wp-content/plugins/add-meta-tags/metadata/amt_basic.php on line 118
Commentary | Portfolio Yoga - Part 2

Misplaced Anger

With Equity Markets taking a beating, Questions are being raised about the efficiency of pure Equity funds with even AMC heads these days promoting Balanced / Dynamic / Asset Management funds as the better alternative for they haven’t fallen as much as Equity.

Of course, given the fact that most of these fund houses run larger pure equity funds, the current fascination with these funds will last only as long as equity seems volatile. The moment the pure equity funds start generating stronger returns, the focus will once again shift back to those funds.

Most of these funds run based on a simple quantitative model of allocation to equities being dependent on the price earnings ratio of the Index. As markets become expensive, the equity weights in these funds go lower and vice versa. The Portfolio Yoga Asset Allocator too works on a similar frame-work.

If you are comfortable with market returns without the accompanying market risks, these can be good funds to invest given that the Large Cap Equity Premium in India for quite a while has been negligible.

Look at the comparative chart (Source: Valueresearch) comparing Large Cap Index Fund, Mid Cap & Small Cap active funds versus a simple Liquid Fund and ICICI Pru Balanced Advantage which is a Asset Allocation Hybrid Fund.

The best fund from the starting point of this chart – DSP Small Cap Fund {SBI Small Cap fund had similar returns for the said period}.

But this performance did not come with low volatility. In fact, DSP head Kalpen Parekh recently tweeted this

The trade-off to attempt a higher return is by taking a higher risk. Mid Caps are riskier than Large Caps and Small Caps are riskier than Mid Caps. While Mid and Small Cap stocks have more or less been bearish since 2018, the returns are even today substantially better than large caps.

While I don’t know if the trend will continue in the future as well, we can only base our decisions based on past data. But what I am trying to showcase is that there is no free lunch wherein you can have the upside of equity with the downside or volatility of Bonds.

Buy and Hold on Equity has not generated phenomenal returns for investors. But that has been seen in history as well – the returns are lumpy in nature. If there is no Risk Management, you gain in the good days and lose some of that in the bad days and overall hope you can beat a simple fixed income return on the long term.

While some amount of Risk Management by cutting off the fat tails to the left can be achieved by using a trend following filter, there are trade offs to be made and one which may not yield greatly in terms of return but provide you comfort when it comes to Risk. 

The Importance of Asset Allocation in one’s investment framework

Managing money is tough regardless of whether it’s one’s own money or the money of others, there is a responsibility of wisely managing it. Most of us wish to outsource this clumsy business to others – mutual funds, banks, etc. In some ways we always feel they with their superior skills will be able to manage our assets better than we ever can.

The question that confronts many is our ability to gauge whether the investment we have done is on the right track. One way experts advise is to forget about returns and concentrate upon whether we are on track to meet the goals. This is actually pretty good advise given that the final objective of our investments is to meet our goals, be it ensuring that we have enough to tide over the years when we will no longer be employed or goals such as ensuring that we can celebrate the wedding of our children or enable them to make choices when it comes to education without worrying where the money is going to come from.

But the problem with the current way of goal planning anticipates a steady return from markets and continuous employment and ability to contribute on a continuous basis. For most, this is the simple way given that we really cannot forecast the uncertainties that may arise in the midst of our journey but one where the long term averages provide us both hope and a sense of being in the right direction.

The current market fall would have created a massive divergence between where you planned to be versus where you had to be. But if you have a long road ahead, the probability is that this glitch will overtime be overcome and then some.

For most, asset allocation ratio is something you plan once and then forget about it. While the equity part is seen as the driver for growth, the debt part is seen as the stabilizer. How much equity you have is based on your risk profile and how long your target time is. Longer the time and higher the risk taking ability, greater the allocation to equities that is recommended.

This fall brings about many lessons. Key among these is that imported templates of debt equity split we bring from the United States is not really applicable to developing countries such as India where Interest Rates are pretty high relatively speaking. India is one of the very few countries to have real positive interest rates while much of the world has negative.   

Last year was a lesson in better understanding Debt funds and the risk they come with. This time, its Equity even though the risk was supposedly known. 

One common observation among all historic falls has been the panicking of the retail investor. We are nowhere close to that this time around with more funds being added. I don’t think human behavior with respect to Fear and Greed can be changed by uttering the mantra “Mutual Fund Sahi Hai”  1001 times.

To me, this means that the bear market which more or less started for the broader markets 2 and quarter years back and one that started for the mainline indices a month back is nowhere close to where it could bottom.

Time in markets is more important than Timing the markets they say. While this is true based once again using historical data, living through such times is tougher than most anticipated when looking at a long term chart of an Index. To me, this is India’s first real bear market in a long time since it is impacting the common folk as much as the Investor. Key lessons to learn out there for sure.

Introducing Portfolio Yoga Elite Discussion Forum

In February 2004, I started a Yahoo based group for discussions around Technical Analysis. Over time, this became a group that was thousands of members strong with hundreds of messages exchanged by members whose contribution has remained invaluable. Personally, I learnt a lot and made a lot of new friends. 

Today, when I say messages, the first thought that comes to mind is Twitter sized messages, but the messages we exchanged on the group were email based and many times consisted of deep writing – God, I miss those days.

Thanks to a commercial event that literally split the group down (the group was a non profit initiative that was supported only by members’ passion to learn and exchange ideas), the group met its death a few years back.

I have had many requests to either re-start the group or start a new one. But over time, I am beginning to feel that most people these days don’t have the interest of reading let alone reading through deep discussion emails especially when we have been addicted to Twitter.

Some time back, I opened my Twitter DM to Public to try and provide views to anyone who had queries when it came to finance. With the turmoil we are seeing in markets, I have got more messages than what I expected. 

On Twitter, it’s easy to just shoot and forget on what portfolio to build. But without some sort of support, this can be implemented only by those who are knowledgeable and understand the nuances of such investment

One of the things I learnt at Capitalmind where I worked for nearly 3 years was that there is a very high requirement for people to have a platform to interact. While Twitter provides for such, if you are not followed by others, you don’t get answers to your questions either and its not easy to build a network either. On the other hand, there are good people with low following which means that their views and opinions don’t get the publicity they need to get.

The future path of Portfolio Yoga I envisioned to be an advisory with active discussion forum that can provide investors ability to understand finance better. Thanks to Corona, that has got delayed. But markets being what they are, there is a huge vacuum that requires to be filled.

I have created a Slack Discussion Forum which in future will be open to only paid members, but given the uncertainty in the markets and the delay in starting off my own venture, I am now opening it to the public at large. 

Do note that the whole forum being public, I have no way to monitor all messages or approve the same. Please do follow etiquette you would normally follow with your friends and family. Members violating the same including abuse would be removed. No discussion on Politics or Religion either. 

Please do note that this is not a Financial Advice forum nor is Portfolio Yoga registered as one. This is a forum designed to help answer your questions. Hope you see you there. 

If you have any queries, ping me on Twitter @prashanth_krish. My DM’s continue to be open. 

Speaking Engagement: India Trading Conclave 2020

I shall be speaking at the Indian Trading Conclave 2020. A event that requires no travelling or spending megabucks and at comfort of your location.

I don’t consider myself to be a trader these days even though when one talks about “Momentum”, the automatic assumption is that one is trading since investing is all about Value / Growth.

I shall try to dispel such doubts in my talk. I believe long term investing has nothing to do with holding period which could be long or short depending on one’s choice of time-frame.

Even if you are not interested in “Technical Analysis” perse, I believe that attending the seminar can give you new perspectives and thoughts.

Since the event is a non-interactive one, no questions will be taken but am happy to answer any questions you may have via email or on Twitter.

If you are interested but have any questions, you can connect with the organizers here

https://twitter.com/IIC_2019

Since this is a paid event, I shall not be able to share the slides. I do believe that more than the slides, my explanation would help understand better.

Impact of Performance Fees on Performance

Assume you have 25 Lakhs you wish to invest in the stock markets but are confused on where to invest and when not to talk about the fact that you don’t have the time to monitor. Rather than risk your capital vanishing due to bad calls, you call me, a portfolio manager to handle your funds and invest right.

I sign you up as a client and claim I will charge a low asset management fee but will charge you a performance fee. As a client I am sure you understand the need for both – the asset management fee helps run the company while the performance fee is incentive for me to, well perform.

So, here is the fee details

Fixed Fee of 0.60%

Performance Fee: 20% of Profits

Some PMS use a hurdle rate of say 5% or 10%. But they also charge a higher level of fixed fee. The above is the fee charged by a real life PMS, so am not making it all up.

What is performance Fee you may ask?

It’s a fee that is charged if I can generate a positive return. Now, back to you or rather me since I now have 25 Lakhs that I need to deploy.

Now, I have a Momentum Strategy which I really believe will generate above market returns, but to generate above market returns, one must also be different and this difference can result in risks such as draw-downs of the nature we see today.

As much as you have trusted me with your money, should I try out-performing at the cost of such risks which require explaining month after month even as you observe that the front line indices keep making all time highs?

A simpler way would be to invest in Nifty ETF’s. The SBI Nifty ETF charges just around 0.07% and is liquid enough for buying and selling in volumes. So, I will just buy SBI Nifty ETF for you.

In the first year, Nifty 50 goes up 20%. This means that your portfolio is up 20% too, but that is not your return, No Sir. That is Community Adjusted Profits. To calculate the real profit, we first need to subtract a few things.

First we shall remove our management fee. 0.60% of 30 Lakhs (25 Lakhs with 20% return) is 18K. So, your asset value post management fee is 29.82 Lakhs. From this we deduct our performance fee of 20% (20% of the 20% gains) which comes to 1 Lakh. Deducting this would reduce your capital to 28.82 Lakhs. Of course, I am ignoring Brokerage, STT, GST and all other taxes that are levied on your account at actuals.

Based on my assumptions, this will reduce your capital to 28.50 Lakhs. Yes, you are still profitable but thanks to the fee structure and the way its applied, your 20% gains is now reduced to 14%.

I will never invest in a PMS that just invests in Nifty and if I do, I won’t pay any performance fee you may claim. The truth though is that while most PMS don’t buy a simple product such as Nifty ETF and do try to beat the Index, they tend to use the wrong benchmark to showcase a much better performance when its just Beta that has powered their performance.

The right way to know if the funds are doing anything different from the Benchmark can be tricky but is not impossible to measure.

2 & 20 is what Hedge Funds charge. I came across the following quote in an interview of Hedge Fund Genius Stanley Druckenmiller

When I started out, we were expected to make 20% in down markets and that’s how 2 and 20 came about.

Stanley Druckenmiller

In other words, performance fee is worth paying if the fund makes money for you in both up and down markets. But most PMS are long only which means that when markets go down, so do they.

PMS already suffers from tax disadvantage compared to Mutual Funds since all transactions are carried out in one’s own account. The disadvantage when it comes to Performance Fees is that they are not allowed to be set off against one’s Short or Long Term Tax consideration. (Recent Case)

The basic premise of PMS was to manage the funds of each client in accordance with the needs of the client in a manner which does not partake character of a Mutual Fund. The reality though is nothing of that sort with most clients owing the same model portfolio in the same weights.

The only advantage of PMS over Mutual Funds lies in their ability to move to Cash to the fullest extent if necessary. Given the opaque nature of portfolio management, one wonders if that one advantage which can be created by using prudent asset allocation is worth looking over all the negatives.

It’s not as if all PMS are not worth looking into for investing purposes, but unless they are doing something very different from what is available in the form of ETF’s or Mutual Funds, the fees they charge may well negate any advantages they bring to the table.

Till investors understand that there is no free lunch, there will always be complicated financial products that seem better than simple ones that are offered with no fanfare. As the Latin proverb goes, Caveat emptor.

Hardest thing about Investing

A year back, the famous Anonymous Twitter Guru @contrarianEPS posted a list of stocks he randomly picked due to their high price to earnings ratio and called it a ticking time bomb that shall either blow up or shall undergo a time correction.

My own thought was that even though these stocks were expensive, I felt they could out-perform Nifty 50, the Index that is today the goal of every fund manager to beat. 

https://twitter.com/Prashanth_Krish/status/1070718652125712384

A year is a short time in investing, but for now the randomly chosen high valuation stocks have beaten the large cap index which itself is seen as an anomaly given that more than 70% of stocks even today trade below their 200 day average.

When the dot com bubble took place, an investor / fund manager had two choices. Play the trend without giving much weight to the fact that the valuations seemed to be ridiculous even for a novice in finance or try and play with the hope that when the music finally ended, you were not caught holding the wrong set of stocks.

Warren Buffett decided to sit out of the game. With internet stocks making new highs literally every day, he underperformed big time. Media saw him as someone who had lost his grip on investing and how he was missing out on the next biggest trend. Of course, Warren had the last laugh.

Stanley Druckenmiller made his name when he was hired to run the Quantum Fund by George Soros. Druckenmiller is one of the best performing hedge fund managers of all time. Yet, when it came to the Dot com bubble, he stumbled and stumbled bad enough to get himself out of Quantum funds.

In an interview in 2015, he described his biggest mistake 

Well, I made a lot of mistakes, but I made one real doozy. So, this is kind of a funny story, at least it is 15 years later because the pain has subsided a little. But in 1999 after Yahoo and America Online had already gone up like tenfold, I got the bright idea at Soros to short internet stocks. And I put 200 million in them in about February and by mid-march the 200 million short I had lost $600 million, gotten completely beat up and was down like 15 percent on the year. And I was very proud of the fact that I never had a down year, and I thought well, I’m finished.

So, the next thing that happens is I can’t remember whether I went to Silicon Valley or I talked to some 22-year-old with Asperger’s. But whoever it was, they convinced me about this new tech boom that was going to take place. So I went and hired a couple of gun slingers because we only knew about IBM and Hewlett-Packard. I needed Ventas and Verisign. I wanted the six. So, we hired this guy and we end up on the year — we had been down 15 and we ended up like 35 percent on the year. And the Nasdaq’s gone up 400 percent.

So, I’ll never forget it. January of 2000 I go into Soros’s office and I say I’m selling all the tech stocks, selling everything. This is crazy. [unint.] at 104 times earnings. This is nuts. Just kind of as I explained earlier, we’re going to step aside, wait for the next fat pitch. I didn’t fire the two gun slingers. They didn’t have enough money to really hurt the fund, but they started making 3 percent a day and I’m out. It is driving me nuts. I mean their little account is like up 50 percent on the year. I think Quantum was up seven. It’s just sitting there.

So like around March I could feel it coming. I just – I had to play. I couldn’t help myself. And three times during the same week I pick up a – don’t do it. Don’t do it. Anyway, I pick up the phone finally. I think I missed the top by an hour. I bought $6 billion worth of tech stocks, and in six weeks I had left Soros and I had lost $3 billion in that one play. You asked me what I learned. I didn’t learn anything. I already knew that I wasn’t supposed to do that. I was just an emotional basket case and couldn’t help myself. So, maybe I learned not to do it again. But I already knew that.

One of my observations and one that data has repeatedly shown to be true is that most investors are unable to stick to a strategy and philosophy that they believe in. Rather, they desire to be seen doing what everyone else is doing for there is always the fear of missing out.

In 2017, Pink Papers, Blogs and Television all showcased the same thing – how great it was to be in small cap stocks. A small cap fund manager who generated 67% returns was seen everywhere extolling the advantage of picking good business with bad managements. 2 Years later he is nowhere to be seen having been replaced by another fund manager who has generated 26% returns year to date. 

The hardest thing about investing is not about picking the right stocks or the strategy but to be able to stick when things aren’t flowing in your favor. All forms of investing carries the risk of under-performance at some point of time or other for otherwise, it will be a holy grail into which all money will get invested. 

Just take a look at the chart below. 

A sector that performed great in one year rarely turned out to the winner the next year as well. But other than a couple of sectors, every sector had more good years than bad. But only those who stayed will have enjoyed the benefit while those who tried to chase (and chasing blindly isn’t Momentum Investing) would have seen a lot of grief.

As Warren Buffett says, it’s important to stay within one’s circle of competence if one wishes to be a successful investor. Of course, that assumes you have a Edge for without an Edge, no amount of staying anywhere will get you the success you believe you deserve.

Active vs Passive debate rolls on

Aarti Krishnan of Prime Investor posted today an article titled “What are the Risks in Index Funds”. 

Basically she boils it down to 

  1. They do not protect you from market volatility
  2. They may have concentrated portfolios
  3. They don’t shield you from business or governance risks
  4. They do not guarantee superior returns

I believe that the above reasons aren’t in themselves reasons that make Index funds Risky in any way compared to the alternatives (Active Mutual Funds). My views on the points raised and my thoughts on what is the better approach.

They do not protect you from market volatility

While there are various ways to measure volatility, for me the choice is to look at maximum draw-down. Draw-down is the percentage change the instrument has suffered from the time it hit its peak. 

For example, Nifty 50 hit a high of 6357 in January 2008. By March of next year, it was down to 2600 levels. In other words the Index had declined by nearly 60%. If you had invested in a passive fund or ETF, this is the draw-down you would have seen since the fund mimics the Index, nothing more nothing less.

On the other hand, Active Mutual funds have a fund manager to look after the portfolio and hence your interests. It’s the very reason you pay 2.5% yearly. They wouldn’t have done so badly, right?

Here is the chart depicting the draw-down faced by various mutual funds. Do note that some of these funds weren’t large cap at that time.

Large Cap Mutual Fund draw-down from Peak

As you can see, Mutual Fund’s did not shine themselves too well. But that is excusable as long as they deliver alpha – or gain more than the Index gains itself you may say which is true. As long as a fund manager delivers a higher return than the Index after fees, his fee is none of the concern unless you believe that you can do better than him.

The following table from S&P shows 6 out of 10 funds have failed to beat the Index. This presents an issue – Can you select the better fund 10 years ahead of time. In the last three years, just one or two funds out of 10 have outperformed. 

Maybe this can reverse, Maybe it won’t. But purely based on Data, Active funds carry the same risks as passive while not really delivering big, at least when it comes to Large Cap Funds.

They may have concentrated portfolios

Since Indices are free float market weighted, sectors that are the current favorite have a higher degree of concentration than the one’s that have fallen out of favor. With the current favorite being financials, it no wonder that it dominates the Index. But this has always been the case. If you remember in 2007, Index weight was dominated by Infrastructure & Ambani companies. 

Concentrated Portfolio in itself isn’t wrong. The key is to have conviction in the stock and bet on the same. A diversified portfolio is good when conviction in the stocks is low and one reason my own Momentum Portfolio has a 30 stock portfolio.

If you look at the portfolio’s of most funds and compare them to the benchmark index, you can see very little differentiation out there. Its as if they are closet index funds with a pinch of active.

They don’t shield you from business or governance risks

Indices that are fundamental agnostic do once in a way add a stock that carries significant risks. But that risk is carried by even active funds. When Manpasand fells on questions of Corporate Governance, more than a few funds were found to be holding the same. Everyone makes mistakes, Active or not, you cannot avoid such risks completely.

They do not guarantee superior returns

I think this point was the focus of the article going the replies in response to a tweet. Index funds actually underperform the Index to the extent of their fees and slippages. But with fees for ETF’s (different from Index funds) as low as 0.07%, one wonders should one be concerned.

Does all the above info mean that it makes no sense to go active and instead one should buy the cheapest ETF or Index traded fund? 

I disagree. Mutual Funds have their use case, but it’s more of an active strategy than a passive one of just Buy and Hold for a lifetime. If your use case if Buy and Forget, I think there is more benefit buying a Multi Cap fund than buying an Index which buys the top 100 stocks of today.

When we invest in funds, we are betting on the fund philosophy / fund manager. That being the case, why should you limit him to buying only from the top 100 stocks or stocks ranked from 100 to 250 for instance.

Multicap funds allow the fund manager to take a call on where he feels value is there in the current market scenario and bet on those segment regardless whether its from the large cap or small cap.

Another style of funds that is worth being in active vs passive is from the Small Cap and Thematic funds. But here too some amount of timing is required unless you can stomach draw-downs of 70%+ that few funds saw in 2008 / 09 for instance and one that took years to reclaim.

The biggest risk of Index investing is that Indices can go flat for a long time. India has limited data. I hence calculated the % of time, your investment could have yielded negative returns even post holding for 10 years. For the S&P 500 where data goes back to 1950, that comes to 8% of the time. Not high, but something that you should bear in mind.

The best use case for ETF’s that track Indices is to have a tactical allocation strategy. Be long when the trend is in favor of you and be out when its not. Right now the trend in large cap is hot and strong and a good time to be invested. But there will come a time when its out of favor and it makes no sense to go through the pain. 

SEBI sounds the death knell for boutique PMS. 

In India, you can manage other people’s money in three ways – Mutual Funds, Alternative Investment Funds and Portfolio Management Service. While much of the world has only two options, Mutual Fund and Hedge Fund, PMS in India was a hybrid way for small fund managers to provide a way to manage the funds of each client in accordance with the needs of the client.

Of course, most PMS doesn’t really operate in that way. Rather every client regardless of his risk appetite is sold the same portfolio of stocks. In other words, PMS have become more like a Mutual Fund and one that suffers from tax disadvantage as well.

Few months back, SEBI constituted a Working  Group to review the SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations. The SEBI board yesterday met and approved the suggestions. Key changes are

  1. Networth of the PMS firm is now raised to 5 Crores vs 2 Crores earlier
  2. Clients now have to invest a minimum of 50 Lakhs vs 25 Lakhs earlier.  
  3. Custodian is now compulsory for all PMS. Earlier, you could have managed upto 500 Crores without the need for a Custodian
  4. The fund manager now has to have a professional qualification in finance, law, accountancy or business management

In recent years, PMS’s have taken off with total assets under management crossing 140K Crores with more than 350 PMS in operation. The new changes, especially with regard to the minimum amount is bound to have an impact on the growth going forward.

The intention for all changes by SEBI is to safeguard  the interest of investors. But the recommendations that are now applicable will reduce competition and actually hurt the interests of the clients.

In the United States, you can start your own mutual fund relatively easy. The cost of starting a mutual fund ranges from around 20 Lakhs to 80 Lakhs. In India, you need a networth of 50 Crores to start a Mutual Fund.

While the regulations for PMS aren’t as stringent compared to say stock brokers, we haven’t seen any PMS running away with clients money. On the other hand, you have multiple brokers who have vanished with crores of client money.

To avoid small investors from getting burnt in derivatives, SEBI has from the start taken a stand that the minimum size of the contract will be high. This was recently enhanced to an even higher level. But dig a bit deeper and you shall find that this has led to more clients losing more money than being saved. 

Another rule that is now applicable and makes no sense is the requirement for a professional degree. Once again, there is no correlation to show that just because I have a professional degree in law, can I also be a great fund manager. But the higher powers seem to believe that.

A CFA certification in my opinion has a far greater value than a Management Degree since the focus is totally on understanding companies, their Balance Sheet and the ability to spot frauds and inconsistencies. Moreover, being international in reach, it ensures that the fund manager follows the best global practices.

The current move while not totally surprising is a retrogressive one. There are various ways in which SEBI could have safeguarded investor interests while at the same time provided for more choices. Sadly, once again we have missed that boat.

Links: Issuance of SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2019